Bombay High Court Allows College to Participate in CAP Admission Despite AICTE Zero Intake Order — Relies on Similar Reasoning in Saraswati Education Society Case. AICTE's decision to put college in zero intake category set aside on grounds of parity with similarly situated institution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 164
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering, a college run by a public charitable trust and imparting technical education based on approval from AICTE, challenged the decision dated 30 April 2015 of Respondent No.1 (AICTE) putting the college into no admission category (zero intake capacity) for the academic year 2014-15. The petition was filed on 5 May 2015. On 8 May 2015, the court granted ad interim relief permitting the college to participate in CAP admission for the academic year 2015-16. The matter was heard finally along with other connected matters. The court noted that it had already recorded basic reasons in Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE (Writ Petition No. 4586 of 2015) dated 14 August 2015, both on issues of law and related aspects. Since the petitioner was similarly situated and challenging similar action/orders, the court held that the reasons and decision in that case were fully applicable. Accordingly, the court disposed of the petition in terms of the reasons recorded in that judgment, directing that the interim order dated 8 May 2015 be continued and made absolute. The rule was made absolute accordingly.

Headnote

A) Technical Education - AICTE Approval - Zero Intake Category - Challenge to AICTE decision reducing intake to zero - Court allowed petition relying on reasons recorded in Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE (Writ Petition No. 4586 of 2015) - Held that the petitioner being similarly situated is entitled to same relief (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the decision of AICTE to put the petitioner college into no admission category (zero intake) for the academic year 2014-15 is sustainable and whether the college is entitled to participate in CAP admission for 2015-16.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of in terms of the reasons recorded in Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering v. AICTE (Writ Petition No. 4586 of 2015). The interim order dated 8 May 2015 is continued and made absolute. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • AICTE approval process
  • zero intake category
  • interim relief
  • parity with similarly situated institutions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 25

Writ Petition No. 4620 of 2015

2015-08-14

Anoop V. Mohta, V. L. Achliya

Mr. S.C. Naidu a/w Mr. Rahul Tanwani & Mr. Aniketh Poojary i/by Mr. C.R. Naidu & Co. for the Petitioners; Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sarnath Sariputta, and Swaraj Jadhav for AICTE; Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for the State

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College of Engineering (through its Principal Dr. Vikram Patil)

All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), Director of Technical Education, State of Maharashtra, Shivaji University

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging AICTE's decision to put the petitioner college into no admission category (zero intake) for academic year 2014-15.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the decision dated 30 April 2015 and for directions to issue revised EOA with full intake capacity for 2014-15 and/or 2015-16.

Filing Reason

AICTE reduced the college's intake to zero, preventing admissions.

Previous Decisions

On 8 May 2015, the court granted ad interim relief permitting participation in CAP admission for 2015-16.

Issues

Whether the AICTE decision to put the college in zero intake category is valid. Whether the college is entitled to participate in CAP admission for 2015-16.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the decision was arbitrary and without proper hearing. AICTE opposed the petition, but the court relied on its earlier reasoning in a similar case.

Ratio Decidendi

A college similarly situated to another institution whose challenge to AICTE's zero intake decision was allowed is entitled to the same relief on grounds of parity.

Judgment Excerpts

The reasons and the decision in said case, is fully applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case, as the Petitioner is similarly situated and challenging the similar action/orders of the Respondents.

Procedural History

Petition filed on 5 May 2015. On 8 May 2015, ad interim relief granted permitting participation in CAP admission for 2015-16. Heard finally on 14 August 2015 along with connected matters.

Acts & Sections

  • All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when it discloses a cause of action and raises triable...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition of an 85-Year-Old Fruit Vendor, Condoning Delay in Filing Review Petition Due to Old Age and Illness. The Court Held That Sufficient Cause Was Shown Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and Dir...