Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Plaintiff Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act for Want of Readiness and Willingness. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, a prerequisite for protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 106
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Reubai w/o Tulsiram, filed a suit for permanent injunction against Babalal s/o Husenbhai, claiming that the defendant had agreed to sell 1/4th portion of Gat No.63 in Umri village, Beed, for Rs.5000/-, and that she paid Rs.3000/- on the date of agreement (14/12/1974) and was put in possession. She alleged that the defendant later tried to disturb her possession. The defendant denied the agreement, claiming it was a loan transaction of Rs.2000/- with interest, and that possession was not given. The trial court found that there was an agreement of sale and the plaintiff was put in possession, but refused relief because the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform her part. The first appellate court dismissed the appeal, citing Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act. The High Court admitted the second appeal on the substantial question of law: whether the plaintiff is entitled to protection under Section 53-A. The High Court noted that the plaintiff had not taken any steps to complete the transaction before the suit, and upheld the concurrent findings, dismissing the appeal.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Part Performance - Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Readiness and Willingness - The plaintiff sought injunction based on an agreement of sale and possession, but failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform her part of the contract. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the suit. The High Court upheld the dismissal, holding that without readiness and willingness, protection under Section 53-A is not available. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to protection of Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act, in view of the pleading in the plaint and the material produced by him.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The second appeal is dismissed. The concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court are upheld.

Law Points

  • Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act
  • 1882
  • Section 41(h) of Specific Relief Act
  • 1963
  • readiness and willingness
  • part performance
  • permanent injunction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 2

Second Appeal No.474/1991

2015-08-20

T.V. Nalawade

Shri M.G. Kolse Patil for appellant, Shri Y.M. Khan for respondent

Reubai w/o Tulsiram

Babalal s/o Husenbhai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for permanent injunction based on an agreement of sale and part performance.

Remedy Sought

Permanent injunction restraining the defendant from disturbing the plaintiff's possession.

Filing Reason

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant agreed to sell property, put her in possession, but later tried to disturb her possession.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court dismissed the suit; First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that she was put in possession under an agreement of sale and paid part consideration. Defendant contended that the document was a loan transaction and possession was not given.

Ratio Decidendi

For protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, the plaintiff must prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract. Mere possession under an agreement is insufficient without such readiness and willingness.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to protection of Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act, in view of the pleading in the plaint and the material produced by him. From the pleadings, it can be said that plaintiff had not taken any steps before the date of Suit for completion of the transaction.

Procedural History

Regular Civil Suit No.124/1978 was filed by the plaintiff for injunction and dismissed by the trial court. Regular Civil Appeal No.166/1981 was filed in the District Court, Beed, and dismissed. The present second appeal was filed in the High Court and admitted on the substantial question of law.

Acts & Sections

  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882: 53-A
  • Specific Relief Act, 1963: 41(h)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Plaintiff Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act for Want of Readiness and Willingness. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the plaintiff fa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Damages Levy Case Under Section 14B of EPF Act — Delay in Payment of Provident Fund Dues Attracts Damages Irrespective of Financial Difficulties. Financial Hardship Not a Va...