Bombay High Court Quashes Commissioner's Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Revision Proceeding. Order set aside as notice of preponed hearing was not served on the petitioner, violating principles of natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Manoharlal Hundrajmal Gidwani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2014 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati, in Revision No. 207/MEC81/Paratwada/201314. The dispute arose from a revision proceeding where the Commissioner had initially fixed the hearing for 2nd September 2014 but later preponed it to 20th July 2014. The petitioner contended that no notice of the preponed hearing date was served upon him, and the acknowledgment on record at page 31 indicated receipt only by respondent No. 4 (Sunil Shambhudayalji Vyas). The Commissioner did not file any reply to contradict this claim. The High Court observed that in the absence of any stand by the Commissioner that notice was served on the petitioner, the order impugned was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the parties were directed to appear before the Commissioner on 18th May 2015 without fresh notice. The Commissioner was directed to decide the matter in accordance with law within six months thereafter. No order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Notice of Hearing - The Commissioner preponed the hearing of a revision from 2nd September 2014 to 20th July 2014, but the notice of the preponed date was served only on respondent No. 4 and not on the petitioner. The Commissioner passed the order on 31st July 2014 without giving the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. The High Court held that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and quashed it, directing the Commissioner to decide the matter afresh after hearing the parties. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order passed by the Commissioner on 31st July 2014 in Revision No. 207/MEC81/Paratwada/201314 is liable to be set aside for being passed in violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of notice to the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. The order dated 31st July 2014 passed by the Commissioner in Revision No. 207/MEC81/Paratwada/201314 is quashed and set aside. The parties to appear before the Commissioner on 18th May 2015. No fresh notice shall be issued. The Commissioner shall decide the matter in accordance with law within a period of six months thereafter. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Notice of hearing
  • Violation of natural justice
  • Quashing of order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 133

WRIT PETITION NO. 6839 of 2014

2015-04-27

R. K. Deshpande

Shri A.S.Kilor for Petitioner; Smt. Rashi Deshpande, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3; Shri J.B.Kasat for Respondent No.4

Manoharlal Hundrajmal Gidwani

The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati; The Collector, Amravati; Sub Divisional Officer, Paratwada; Sunil Shambhudayalji Vyas

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an order passed by the Divisional Commissioner in a revision proceeding on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 31st July 2014 passed by the Commissioner in Revision No. 207/MEC81/Paratwada/201314.

Filing Reason

The petitioner claimed that the order was passed without giving him notice of the preponed hearing date, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Commissioner had passed the impugned order on 31st July 2014 in the revision proceeding.

Issues

Whether the order passed by the Commissioner on 31st July 2014 is liable to be set aside for being passed in violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of notice to the petitioner.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the hearing date was preponed from 2nd September 2014 to 20th July 2014, but no notice of the preponed date was served on him; the acknowledgment on record showed receipt only by respondent No. 4. The Commissioner did not file any reply to contradict the petitioner's claim.

Ratio Decidendi

An order passed without giving notice of hearing to a party is in violation of the principles of natural justice and is liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

The Commissioner has not filed any reply stating that the notice of hearing of the revision on 20th July, 2014 was delivered to the petitioner. In the absence of any such stand, the order impugned has to be set aside on the ground that it has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31st July 2014 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati, in Revision No. 207/MEC81/Paratwada/201314. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 27th April 2015.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Orders Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Petitioners' Custody Status and Relied on Unver...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Deletion of Issues and Rejection of Section 151 Application. Court holds that Order XIV Rule 5 CPC allows deletion of issues at any stage and Section 151 CPC cannot be used to circumvent sp...