Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as injuries from razor blade were simple and not sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 129
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Dhanraj Ishwar Gawali, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for allegedly attempting to murder Raju Chandanshive by inflicting two blows with a razor blade on his abdomen. The prosecution case was that on 3rd April 2014, the appellant met Raju on the road and asked him to go to the river bed. When Raju refused, the appellant took out a razor blade and gave two blows on his abdomen. Raju ran towards a police outpost but found it empty, then met his friend Bandu Kadam who informed Raju's mother Suman. Suman reported the matter to the police and Raju was admitted to YCM hospital for 3-4 days where his injuries were stitched. The appellant was charged and convicted, sentenced to 7 years RI and fine. In appeal, the appellant argued that the injuries were simple and there was no intention to kill. The court examined the evidence, including the medical certificate showing simple injuries, and noted that the weapon was a small razor blade. The court held that the ingredients of Section 307 IPC were not satisfied as there was no intention to cause death or knowledge that the act was likely to cause death. The conviction was set aside and the appellant was acquitted.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - Intention to Kill - The court examined whether the injuries inflicted by a razor blade on the abdomen were sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. Held that the injuries were simple and stitched, and the weapon used was a small razor blade, indicating lack of intention to cause death. The conviction under Section 307 IPC was set aside and the appellant was acquitted (Paras 1-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's conviction under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for attempting to murder Raju Chandanshive by inflicting two razor blade blows on his abdomen is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of offence under Section 307 IPC. Fine, if paid, to be refunded. Appellant to be released forthwith unless required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Section 307 IPC requires intention to kill or knowledge that act is likely to cause death
  • mere injury not sufficient
  • nature of weapon and injuries considered
  • conviction requires proof of intent beyond reasonable doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 70

Criminal Appeal No.147 of 2015

2015-04-23

Abhay M. Thipsay

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi for appellant, Mrs. Anamika Malhotra APP for respondent

Dhanraj Ishwar Gawali

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for attempt to murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by setting aside conviction and sentence under Section 307 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant convicted for attempting to murder Raju Chandanshive by inflicting razor blade blows on abdomen

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant and sentenced to 7 years RI and fine

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant had the intention to kill Raju Chandanshive or knowledge that his act was likely to cause death, as required under Section 307 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that injuries were simple and there was no intention to kill, hence Section 307 IPC not attracted. Respondent State supported the conviction, arguing that the act of attacking on a vital part (abdomen) with a razor blade showed intention to kill.

Ratio Decidendi

For conviction under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution must prove that the accused had the intention to cause death or knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. The nature of the weapon, the injuries inflicted, and the circumstances must indicate such intent. In this case, the injuries were simple, caused by a small razor blade, and the victim was discharged after 3-4 days, showing lack of intention to kill.

Judgment Excerpts

The injuries sustained by Raju were simple in nature. They were stitched. The weapon used was a razor blade. The nature of the weapon and the injuries caused do not indicate an intention to cause death. The conviction under Section 307 IPC cannot be sustained. The appeal is allowed.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 22nd January 2015 in Sessions Case No.409 of 2014. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.147 of 2015 before Bombay High Court. High Court heard and allowed appeal on 23rd April 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC set aside as injuries from razor blade were simple and not sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Group Adjustment Letter Authorized Set-off of Losses Across Family Accounts. The court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the client's claim for unauthorized trades ...