Bombay High Court Allows Post Graduate Medical Students' Challenge Against Closure of PG Courses in ESIC Medical Colleges. ESIC's Decision to Close PG Courses at Two Mumbai Institutes Quashed as Arbitrary and Violative of Students' Rights Under Article 21.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 133
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, six post graduate medical students of ESIPGI MSR, MGM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, challenged the decision of the Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to close down post graduate courses at two institutes in Maharashtra, namely ESIPGI MSR, MGM Hospital, Parel and ESIPGI MSR, Andheri (East), Mumbai. The students had been admitted after successfully passing MBBS and the entrance examination. ESIC, through its Medical Commissioner, had established these institutes for rendering medical services and conducting medical courses. The decision to close the PG courses was taken by ESIC without considering the impact on the students who had already been admitted. The court found that the decision was arbitrary and violative of the students' right to education under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court held that the students had a legitimate expectation that the courses would continue until completion. The court quashed the decision to close the PG courses and directed ESIC to continue the courses for the benefit of the petitioners and other similarly situated students. The judgment was delivered by a division bench of Justices Anoop V. Mohta and K.R. Shriram, with the latter authoring the judgment.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Education - Arbitrariness - ESIC's decision to close PG courses at two Mumbai institutes, affecting students already admitted, was held arbitrary and violative of Article 21 - The court found that the decision was taken without considering the impact on students' careers and without affording them an opportunity of hearing - Held that the students had a legitimate expectation to complete their courses (Paras 1-13).

B) Administrative Law - Legitimate Expectation - Closure of Educational Courses - Students who were admitted to PG medical courses had a legitimate expectation that the courses would continue until completion - The court held that the decision to close the courses mid-stream was unreasonable and could not be sustained (Paras 14-20).

C) Medical Education - Post Graduate Courses - ESI Act, 1948 - The court directed ESIC to continue the PG courses at the two institutes for the benefit of the petitioners and other similarly situated students - The decision to close was quashed and set aside (Paras 21-25).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the decision of ESIC to close down post graduate medical courses at two institutes in Maharashtra, affecting students already admitted, is arbitrary and violative of their rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the decision to close the PG courses, and directed ESIC to continue the courses for the benefit of the petitioners and other similarly situated students.

Law Points

  • Arbitrariness
  • Legitimate Expectation
  • Right to Education
  • Article 21
  • Article 14
  • ESI Act
  • 1948
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 26

Writ Petition No. 11482 of 2014 with connected petitions

2015-04-29

Anoop V. Mohta, K.R. Shriram

Mr. V.A. Thorat, senior advocate a/w. Mr. Prabhanjan Gujar for petitioner in all petitions; Mr. P.S. Gujar for respondent no.1 in all petitions except Writ Petition No.11485/2014; Mr. Dhanesh R. Shah for respondent no.1 in Writ Petition No.11485/2014; Mr. S.S. Pathak for respondent no.2 in all petitions; Mr. Ganesh K. Gole for respondent no.3 in all petitions; Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for State in all petitions.

Dr. Ujwal Narayanrao Chirde, Dr. Janhavi J. Pol, Dr. Basavaraja Ayyangouda, Dr. Chandrashekhar S. Sonawane, Dr. Mohammad Arif Ali, Dr. Ashwin R. Chavan

Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the decision of ESIC to close down post graduate medical courses at two institutes in Maharashtra.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the decision to close PG courses and direction to continue the courses for the benefit of the petitioners.

Filing Reason

ESIC decided to close PG courses at ESIPGI MSR, MGM Hospital, Parel and ESIPGI MSR, Andheri (East), Mumbai, affecting students already admitted.

Issues

Whether the decision of ESIC to close down post graduate medical courses at two institutes in Maharashtra is arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution. Whether the students had a legitimate expectation that the courses would continue until completion.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the decision to close the courses was arbitrary and violated their right to education under Article 21. Respondents argued that ESIC had the authority to take such a decision in the interest of administrative efficiency.

Ratio Decidendi

The decision of ESIC to close post graduate medical courses was arbitrary and violative of the students' right to education under Article 21. The students had a legitimate expectation that the courses would continue until completion, and the decision to close them mid-stream was unreasonable.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners in these six petitions are all post graduate medical students of ESIPGI MSR, MGM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai400 012. The respondent no.5 has taken a decision to close down post graduate courses in Maharashtra being conducted in respondent no.2 and respondent no.7 and to conduct only in 3

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2014. Rule was made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of parties on 23.4.2015. Judgment was pronounced on 29.4.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21, Article 14
  • Employee State Insurance Act, 1948:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Premature Retirement Order Against Employee in National Textile Corporation — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind. Order Set Aside as Corporation Failed to Consider Employee's Representation and Di...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Land Conversion Rejection in KLR Act Case — Deputy Commissioner Directed to Reconsider Application Under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Endorsement Without Reasons Quashed as...