Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Education Officer's Approval as Shikshan Sevaks Instead of Assistant Teachers. Transfer from Unaided to Aided School Based on Seniority Entitles Teachers to Approval as Assistant Teachers.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 90
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by teachers challenging the order of the Education Officer (Secondary) who granted them approval only as Shikshan Sevaks instead of Assistant Teachers. The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers in an aided school by transfer from an unaided school on the basis of seniority. The court noted that the Division Bench in M/s. Sandhya Laxman Ghosalkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No.5258 of 2012) had already held that there was no justification for such limited approval when the teachers were appointed by transfer and were similarly circumstanced with other teachers who received approval as Assistant Teachers. Following that precedent, the court quashed the impugned order and directed the Education Officer to grant approval to the petitioners as Assistant Teachers with effect from 1 August 2011, as mentioned in the approval order. The petitions were disposed of with rule made returnable forthwith.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Approval of Appointment - Transfer from Unaided to Aided School - The Education Officer granted approval only as Shikshan Sevaks to teachers appointed as Assistant Teachers by transfer from unaided to aided school based on seniority. The court held there was no justification for such limited approval, especially when similarly situated teachers were granted approval as Assistant Teachers. The court quashed the order and directed approval as Assistant Teachers with effect from the date mentioned in the approval order. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Education Officer (Secondary) was justified in granting approval to the petitioners only as Shikshan Sevaks instead of Assistant Teachers, when they were appointed by transfer from unaided to aided school on the basis of seniority.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed and set aside the order of the Education Officer (Secondary) and directed the Education Officer to grant approval to the appointments of the petitioners as Assistant Teachers with effect from 1 August 2011 (the date as mentioned in the approval order). Rule made returnable forthwith. Petitions disposed of.

Law Points

  • Approval of appointment as Assistant Teacher
  • Transfer from unaided to aided school
  • Seniority
  • Shikshan Sevak
  • Education Officer's discretion
  • Parity with similarly situated teachers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (04) 158

Writ Petition No. 5278 of 2014 with Civil Application No. 2890 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 5542 of 2014 with Civil Application No. 1859 of 2014, Writ Petition No. 5548 of 2014 with Civil Application No. 1872 of 2014

2015-04-24

Anoop V. Mohta, K.R. Shriram

2015:BHC-AS:10824-DB

Ms. Sucheta Mirarashi i/by Mr. A.M. Joshi for Petitioner/s, Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Mr. S.A. Ghaisas for Respondent No.4, Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (in WP 5548/2014)

Shri Kondikiri Arun Tukaram, Shri Mujawar Mahebub Husensaheb, Smt. Halyal Bharati Bhimrao

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the order of the Education Officer (Secondary) granting approval only as Shikshan Sevaks instead of Assistant Teachers.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the Education Officer's order and direction to grant approval as Assistant Teachers.

Filing Reason

The Education Officer granted approval only as Shikshan Sevaks to the petitioners who were appointed as Assistant Teachers by transfer from unaided to aided school on the basis of seniority.

Previous Decisions

The Division Bench in M/s. Sandhya Laxman Ghosalkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No.5258 of 2012) had held that there was no justification for granting approval only as Shikshan Sevaks when the teachers were appointed as Assistant Teachers by transfer.

Issues

Whether the Education Officer was justified in granting approval only as Shikshan Sevaks instead of Assistant Teachers to teachers appointed by transfer from unaided to aided school on the basis of seniority.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned counsel for the parties stated that all issues are covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in M/s. Sandhya Laxman Ghosalkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra.

Ratio Decidendi

When teachers are appointed as Assistant Teachers in an aided school by transfer from an unaided school on the basis of seniority, the Education Officer has no justification to grant approval only as Shikshan Sevaks, especially when similarly situated teachers have been granted approval as Assistant Teachers.

Judgment Excerpts

In our view, there was no justification whatsoever for the Education Officer (Secondary) to grant his approval only as Shikshan Sevaks to the three Petitioners. If the Petitioners had been appointed as Assistant Teachers in the aided school by transfer from the unaided school on the basis of seniority, the approval ought to have been granted to them as Assistant Teachers.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the order of the Education Officer (Secondary) dated 29 March 2012 granting approval only as Shikshan Sevaks. The matters were heard by a Division Bench along with connected matters. The court disposed of the petitions by common judgment following the precedent in M/s. Sandhya Laxman Ghosalkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Education Officer's Approval as Shikshan Sevaks Instead of Assistant Teachers. Transfer from Unaided to Aided School Based on Seniority Entitles Teachers to Approval as Assistant Teachers.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Maintenance to Wife and Daughters Under Domestic Violence Act — Enhances Monthly Maintenance from Rs. 2,000 to Rs. 5,000. Held that the appellate court erred in setting aside maintenance without considering evidence of dome...