Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in ESI Contribution Case Due to Limitation from Date of Receipt. Period of 60 days under Section 45AA of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 runs from date of communication of order, not date of passing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 130
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Buldana Urban Cooperative Society Ltd., challenged an order dated 22.3.2013 passed by the Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation under Section 45A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 directing payment of contribution for the period from 1.9.2009 to 30.9.2010. The order was dispatched by registered post on 22.3.2013 and received by the petitioner on 28.3.2013. The petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 45AA of the Act on 22.5.2013 along with a demand draft of Rs. 30,000. However, on 29.5.2013, the respondent informed the petitioner that the appeal was submitted after the period of sixty days and could not be considered. The petitioner then sought review, which was also rejected on 29.4.2014. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order under Section 45A and the refusal to entertain the appeal. The legal issue was whether the limitation period of sixty days for appeal under Section 45AA runs from the date of the order or from the date of its communication. The petitioner argued that the period should be counted from the date of receipt (28.3.2013), making the appeal filed on 22.5.2013 within time. The respondents contended that the period runs from the date of the order (22.3.2013). The court analyzed the provision and held that the period of sixty days must be reckoned from the date of receipt of the order, as the right of appeal is valuable and limitation should be construed liberally. Since the appeal was filed within sixty days from 28.3.2013, it was within limitation. The court set aside the communication dated 29.5.2013 refusing to entertain the appeal and directed the respondents to consider the appeal on merits within four weeks. The writ petition was allowed in those terms.

Headnote

A) Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Section 45AA - Limitation for Appeal - Period of sixty days for appeal under Section 45AA is to be reckoned from the date of receipt/communication of the order, not from the date of passing of the order. The court held that the appeal filed within sixty days from the date of receipt of the order is within limitation. (Paras 1, 5-6)

B) Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Section 45A - Assessment of Contribution - Order under Section 45A - Communication - The order under Section 45A was passed on 22.3.2013 but received by the petitioner on 28.3.2013. The appeal filed on 22.5.2013 was within sixty days from the date of receipt. (Paras 3, 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the period of sixty days for preferring an appeal under Section 45AA of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 should be reckoned from the date of the order or from the date of its actual communication.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. The communication dated 29.5.2013 refusing to entertain the appeal is set aside. The respondents are directed to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner on merits within a period of four weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Limitation period for appeal under Section 45AA of ESI Act runs from date of receipt of order
  • not date of passing
  • Limitation should be construed liberally in favour of appellant
  • Communication of order is essential for starting limitation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 132

Writ Petition No. 4607 of 2014

2015-03-12

A. S. Chandurkar

Shri Shrikant Saoji for petitioner, Mrs. B. P. Maldhure for respondents

Buldana Urban Cooperative Society Ltd.

Deputy Director, Sub Regional Office, Employee State Insurance Corporation, Nagpur and another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order under Section 45A of ESI Act and refusal to entertain appeal as time-barred.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside order dated 22.3.2013 under Section 45A and direction to consider appeal on merits.

Filing Reason

Respondent refused to entertain appeal on ground of limitation, counting period from date of order instead of date of receipt.

Previous Decisions

Order under Section 45A passed on 22.3.2013; appeal filed on 22.5.2013; respondent refused to entertain appeal on 29.5.2013; review rejected on 29.4.2014.

Issues

Whether the period of sixty days for appeal under Section 45AA of ESI Act runs from date of order or date of receipt.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that limitation runs from date of receipt of order (28.3.2013), so appeal filed on 22.5.2013 is within time. Respondents argued that limitation runs from date of order (22.3.2013), making appeal time-barred.

Ratio Decidendi

The period of sixty days for preferring an appeal under Section 45AA of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 is to be reckoned from the date of receipt/communication of the order, not from the date of passing of the order.

Judgment Excerpts

The short issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the period of sixty days for preferring an appeal under the provisions of Section 45AA of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 should be reckoned from the date of such order or whether such period should be counted from the date of its actual communication. In the facts of the present case, the order under Section 45A was passed on 22.3.2013. The same was received by the petitioner on 28.3.2013. The appeal was preferred on 22.5.2013. The period of sixty days from 28.3.2013 would expire on 27.5.2013. Hence, the appeal was within limitation.

Procedural History

Order under Section 45A passed on 22.3.2013; dispatched on same day; received by petitioner on 28.3.2013; appeal filed on 22.5.2013; respondent refused to entertain appeal on 29.5.2013; review application rejected on 29.4.2014; writ petition filed challenging order and refusal.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948: 45A, 45AA
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit in Land Sale Agreement Due to Lack of Continuous Readiness and Willingness. Time Was Not of Essence Under Section 55 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, but Purchaser's Failure to Show Readiness Barred Equi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Fragmentation Act Jurisdiction Case — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Declare Ownership Despite Consolidation Scheme. The suit for declaration of ownership and injunction is not barred under Section 36(A) o...