Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Transfer Petition Under Husband-Wife Uniting Policy. Court Directs Zilla Parishad to Implement Appointment Order Dated 1.2.2011 as Vacancies Exist and Policy Aims to Unite Spouses.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 106
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Lilabai Vasant Talekar, was appointed as a Shikshan Sevak by Zilla Parishad, Ratnagiri on 15.6.2007 and later worked as an assistant teacher there. The State Government framed a policy via Government Resolution dated 29.3.2009 (modified on 29.9.2011) to place husband and wife in the same or nearby Zilla Parishad. The petitioner applied on 8.12.2010 for transfer to Pune Zilla Parishad, where her husband worked as a primary teacher. The Education Officer, Ratnagiri forwarded the proposal, and Pune Zilla Parishad issued an order on 1.2.2011 appointing her as assistant teacher on the same terms, stating she would be absorbed in a vacancy arising from promotion or superannuation. However, the order was not implemented, and Ratnagiri Zilla Parishad did not permit her to join. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to implement the order. The court noted that despite service of notice, the respondents did not appear or file a reply. The court found it implausible that no vacancy had arisen since 2011, especially as the petitioner had learned through an RTI query that over 470 posts of assistant teachers were vacant in Pune Zilla Parishad. The court held that the order dated 1.2.2011 must be implemented, directing the Chief Executive Officer of Pune Zilla Parishad to act upon it within four weeks and absorb the petitioner in the next available vacancy. The petition was allowed with rule made absolute.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer Policy - Husband and Wife Uniting - Government Resolution dated 29.3.2009 and 29.9.2011 - The petitioner, a teacher with Zilla Parishad Ratnagiri, sought transfer to Pune Zilla Parishad where her husband worked. Pune Zilla Parishad issued an appointment order on 1.2.2011 but failed to implement it. The court held that the order must be implemented as the policy aims to unite spouses and vacancies exist. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Zilla Parishad is bound to implement its own order dated 1.2.2011 appointing the petitioner as assistant teacher under the Government Resolution policy for uniting husband and wife.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute. The Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Pune is directed to act upon the order dated 1.2.2011 within four weeks and absorb the petitioner in the next available vacancy of assistant teacher.

Law Points

  • Government Resolution policy for uniting husband and wife in same Zilla Parishad
  • Right to Information Act
  • implementation of administrative orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 184

WRIT PETITION NO.5779 OF 2014

2015-03-03

Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, Shri C.V. Bhadang

2015:BHC-AS:5929-DB

Mr.S.S. Pakale i/b A.R. Belge for the Petitioner, Ms.S.S. Bhende, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No.3

Lilabai Vasant Talekar

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Pune

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to implement transfer order under Government policy for uniting husband and wife.

Remedy Sought

Direction to Respondent No.1 – Zilla Parishad, Pune to act upon order dated 1.2.2011 and employ petitioner on same terms as in Ratnagiri.

Filing Reason

Non-implementation of appointment order dated 1.2.2011 by Pune Zilla Parishad despite application under Government Resolution.

Previous Decisions

Pune Zilla Parishad issued order dated 1.2.2011 appointing petitioner as assistant teacher, but not implemented.

Issues

Whether the Zilla Parishad is bound to implement its own order dated 1.2.2011 appointing the petitioner as assistant teacher under the Government Resolution policy for uniting husband and wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that despite order dated 1.2.2011, she was not permitted to join; RTI revealed over 470 vacancies in Pune Zilla Parishad. Respondents did not appear or file reply despite notice.

Ratio Decidendi

An administrative order issued under a government policy for uniting husband and wife must be implemented, especially when vacancies exist and the order has not been challenged.

Judgment Excerpts

By the Government Resolution dated 29.3.2009, which is modified by the resolution dated 29.9.2011, the State Government, has framed a policy for uniting the husband and wife working in two Zilla Parishads by transferring one of them to the Zilla Parishad, where the other is working. It is not possible to believe that no post of assistant teacher has fallen vacant after the no objection certificate was issued to the petitioner by the Pune Zilla Parishad on 1.2.2011.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.5779 of 2014 in Bombay High Court. Notice for final disposal issued on 11.2.2015. Respondents served but did not appear. Heard finally on 3.3.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Right to Information Act, 2005:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Transfer Petition Under Husband-Wife Uniting Policy. Court Directs Zilla Parishad to Implement Appointment Order Dated 1.2.2011 as Vacancies Exist and Policy Aims to Unite Spouses.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and ...