Bombay High Court Reconsiders Interim Directions on River Bed Use for Warkari Pilgrims in Manual Scavenging PIL. Environmental Protection vs Religious Practices - Court to Modify Order Dated 24th December 2014 Based on NEERI Recommendations.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 93
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a public interest litigation concerning manual scavenging, but the present order deals with interim directions regarding the use of the river bed of Chandrabhaga. The Court had earlier issued detailed interim orders on 3rd July 2014 and 24th December 2014. Based on recommendations of the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), the Court directed on 24th December 2014 that the river bed shall not be used for any activity including erection of temporary structures. Two Warkari organisations, Warkari Sahitya Parishad and Warkari Seva Sangh, sought modification of these directions, arguing that the river bed is traditionally used by Warkari pilgrims (devotees of Lord Vithoba) during their annual pilgrimage to Pandharpur. The Court considered the prayer and ordered that the matter be heard further. The order does not finally decide the modification but notes the occasion for reconsideration.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - River Bed Protection - Interim Directions - Prohibition on use of river bed for any activity including temporary structures - Court reconsidered its earlier interim order dated 24th December 2014 based on NEERI recommendations - Held that the directions need modification to balance environmental concerns with religious practices of Warkari pilgrims (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the interim directions prohibiting use of river bed of Chandrabhaga for any activities, including temporary structures for Warkari pilgrims, should be modified in view of the religious and cultural practices of the Warkari community.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court noted the occasion for reconsidering some of the interim directions in view of the prayers made by Warkari organisations and ordered further hearing. No final modification was made in this order.

Law Points

  • Environmental protection
  • Public interest litigation
  • Interim directions
  • River bed use
  • Religious gatherings
  • Manual scavenging
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 66

Public Interest Litigation No.8 of 2012

2015-03-05

A.S. Oka, A.K. Menon

Mr.Mihir Desai (amicus curiae), Mr.N.D. Pote i/b Asim Sarode, Kulkarni and Associates for Petitioner, Mr.A.B. Vagyani GP a/w Mrs.M.P. Thakur for Respondent Nos.1,4 and 6, Mr.Uday Warunjikar for Applicant in CA No.187/2014, Mr.T.J. Pandian for Applicant in CA No.45/2015 and for Respondent No.9, Mr.R.V. Govilkar for Applicant in CA No.50/2015, Mr.R.S. Apte Sr. Advocate i/b Mr.Mandar Limaye for Warkari Sahitya Parishad, Mr.Sarang Satish Aradhye for Respondent No.4, Mr.Gopal Krishna Shivram Hegde for Respondent No.8, Mr.Rahul Shivaji Kadam for Applicant in CA No.192/2014, Mr.Parag Vyas for Respondent No.2

Campaign against Manual Scavenging

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation concerning manual scavenging and environmental protection of river Chandrabhaga.

Remedy Sought

Modification of interim directions dated 24th December 2014 prohibiting use of river bed for any activity, sought by Warkari organisations to allow traditional use by pilgrims.

Filing Reason

The Court had issued interim directions based on NEERI recommendations to protect the river bed, but Warkari organisations sought reconsideration to accommodate religious practices.

Previous Decisions

Interim orders dated 3rd July 2014 and 24th December 2014; order dated 13th June 2014 impleading Warkari Sahitya Parishad.

Issues

Whether the interim directions prohibiting use of river bed of Chandrabhaga for any activities should be modified to allow Warkari pilgrims to use the river bed for temporary structures during their annual pilgrimage.

Submissions/Arguments

Warkari organisations argued that the river bed is traditionally used by Warkari pilgrims and the prohibition affects their religious practices.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court recognized the need to balance environmental protection with religious and cultural practices of the Warkari community, and thus reconsidered its earlier interim directions.

Judgment Excerpts

There are detailed interim orders issued by this Court at different stages. An occasion for reconsidering some of the interim directions arises in view of the prayer made by the learned senior counsel appearing for Warkari Sahitya Parishad... The main issue raised by both the organisations of Warkari is as regards the interim directions issued under the order dated 24th December, 2014 in relation to the use of river bed of the river Chandrabhaga for carrying on various activities.

Procedural History

The PIL was filed in 2012. Interim orders were passed on 3rd July 2014 and 24th December 2014. On 13th June 2014, Warkari Sahitya Parishad was impleaded. On 5th March 2015, the Court heard applications for modification and ordered further consideration.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Commissioner of Wakfs' authority in Bengal Wakf Act matter — dismissing appellant's challenge to temporary Mutawalli appointment. Delegated authority under Sections 40 and 29 of Bengal Wakf Act, 1934 permits Commissioner to ma...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Evacuee Property Act Dispute to High Court for Factual Finding on Shareholder Evacuee Status. Necessary determination under Section 2(f)(1A) of Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 whether majority shareholders of invest...