Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes School Tribunal Order for Lack of Consideration of Statutory Provisions. Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Within Six Months.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 40
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, The Cooperative Education Society and Nagpur Night High School, challenged the judgment and order dated 25th November 2013 passed by the School Tribunal in Appeal No. STN/20/2007. The High Court observed that the impugned order did not consider the rival contentions in the light of statutory provisions, a fact not disputed by either party. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, the Tribunal's order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal was directed to decide the appeal afresh after considering the rival submissions and testing them on the provisions of law, within six months from the date of first appearance of the parties, who were directed to appear on 24th February 2015. No order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Education Law - School Tribunal - Remand - Failure to Consider Statutory Provisions - The School Tribunal passed an order without considering the rival contentions in the light of statutory provisions - The High Court quashed the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration - Held that the Tribunal must decide the appeal afresh after testing submissions on provisions of law (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the School Tribunal's order dated 25th November 2013 in Appeal No. STN/20/2007 was sustainable when it failed to consider rival contentions in light of statutory provisions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The judgment and order dated 25th November 2013 passed in Appeal No. STN/20/2007 is quashed and set aside. The School Tribunal is directed to decide the appeal afresh after taking into consideration the rival submissions which are to be tested on the provisions of law. The Tribunal to decide the matter within six months from the date of first appearance of the parties before it. The parties to appear before the Tribunal on 24th February 2015. Rule made absolute in these terms. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Duty of Tribunal to consider rival contentions in light of statutory provisions
  • Remand for fresh consideration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (02) 120

Writ Petition No. 873 of 2014

2015-02-04

R. K. Deshpande

Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar for Petitioner, Shri A.Z. Jibhkate for Respondent No.1, Shri Neeraj Patil, AGP for Respondent No.2

The Cooperative Education Society and Nagpur Night High School

Vishal Maheshrao Goswami and The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the School Tribunal in an appeal under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the School Tribunal's order dated 25th November 2013 in Appeal No. STN/20/2007.

Filing Reason

The impugned order did not consider the rival contentions in the light of statutory provisions.

Previous Decisions

The School Tribunal passed the order dated 25th November 2013 in Appeal No. STN/20/2007.

Issues

Whether the School Tribunal's order was sustainable when it failed to consider rival contentions in light of statutory provisions.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Tribunal did not consider rival contentions in light of statutory provisions. Respondent did not dispute this fact.

Ratio Decidendi

A Tribunal must consider rival contentions in the light of statutory provisions; failure to do so renders the order unsustainable and warrants remand for fresh consideration.

Judgment Excerpts

Perusal of the order impugned shows that the rival contentions have not at all been considered in the light of the statutory provisions. The matter is, therefore, required to be sent back to the Tribunal for consideration afresh in accordance with law.

Procedural History

The School Tribunal passed an order on 25th November 2013 in Appeal No. STN/20/2007. The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 873 of 2014 in the Bombay High Court challenging that order. The High Court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 4th February 2015.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes School Tribunal Order for Lack of Consideration of Statutory Provisions. Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Within Six Months.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Petition by Airports Authority Against Licensee in Public Premises Act Case. Licence Expired by Efflux of Time, Occupant Becomes Unauthorised Under Section 2(g) of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants)...