Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Voters' List in Cooperative Society Election Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioners' names were included in the final voters' list, thus they had no standing to challenge deletion of other members.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 56
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Babasaheb Bapusaheb Patil and others, filed a writ petition challenging the final voters' list published on 20 January 2015 by respondent No.4 society, which deleted 804 members from the list. They sought a declaration that the final list was illegal and prayed for republishing a revised list including those members. They also sought to stay the election process declared on 13 January 2015. The respondent No.4 raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners lacked locus standi because their names were already included in the final voters' list. The court examined the objection and noted that the petitioners' names appeared in the final list: Petitioner No.1 at Sr. No.8, Petitioner No.3 at Sr. No.20 in the Supplementary List, and Petitioner No.2 at Sr. No.286 shown as a defaulter. The court held that since the petitioners' names were included, they had no grievance and thus no locus standi to challenge the deletion of other members. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Locus Standi - Challenge to Voters' List - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Petitioners whose names were included in the final voters' list challenged the deletion of other 804 members - Held that petitioners have no locus standi to maintain the petition as their names were already included in the final list published on 20.01.2015 (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners have locus standi to challenge the deletion of other members from the voters' list when their own names are included in the final list.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Locus standi
  • Cooperative societies election
  • Voters' list challenge
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (02) 98

WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.2996 OF 2015

2015-02-11

ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.

Mr. Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar (for petitioners), Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP (for respondent Nos. 1 and 2), Mr. C.G. Gavnekar a/w Mr. Suhas Deokar (for respondent No.4)

Babasaheb Bapusaheb Patil and ors.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the final voters' list of a cooperative society and seeking stay of election process.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that final voters' list published on 20 January 2015 is illegal; direction to republish revised list including 804 deleted members; stay of election programme declared on 13 January 2015.

Filing Reason

Petitioners objected to their exclusion from voters' list but their names were included; they challenged deletion of other 804 members.

Previous Decisions

Returning Officer/respondent No.4 considered and accepted petitioners' objection regarding their exclusion in view of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

Issues

Whether the petitioners have locus standi to challenge the deletion of other members from the voters' list when their own names are included in the final list.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the final voters' list deleting 804 members is illegal and bad in law. Respondent No.4 raised preliminary objection that petitioners have no locus standi as their names are already included in the final list.

Ratio Decidendi

A person whose name is included in the final voters' list has no locus standi to challenge the deletion of other members from the list.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners' objection to their exclusion in the voters' list of the society respondent No.4 have been considered/accepted by the Returning Officer respondent No.4, in view of the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. This Respondent further states that the Petitioners have no locus to maintain this petition as the names of the 3 Petitioners are already included in Final Voters List published on 20.01.2015

Procedural History

Petitioners filed writ petition challenging final voters' list published on 20 January 2015. Respondent No.4 filed affidavit dated 10 February 2015 raising preliminary objection on locus standi. Heard finally by consent on 11 February 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 57 — Failure to Inform Immediate Superior Officer Renders Search and Seizure Illegal. The court held that strict compliance with Section 57 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is m...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Untruthful Translation of Grounds in Preventive Detention Case. Failure to Furnish Correct Marathi Translation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerou...