High Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Challenge to Allotment Order — Transfer of Plot Directed to Disputant Member. Concurrent findings of fact by Cooperative Court and Appellate Court upheld under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 154
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vishwabharti Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Limited, a cooperative housing society, challenged the judgments and orders of the Cooperative Court and the Cooperative Appellate Court. The Cooperative Court, in Dispute Case No. 476/1990 under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, directed the Society to execute a transfer deed in respect of Plot No.14 from its layout in Khasra No. 45/4 of Mouza Manewada in favour of the respondent disputant, Vinayak Shankarrao Parkhe, and to deliver possession upon payment of the requisite amount on par with other members. The Society's appeal under Section 97 of the Act was dismissed by the Cooperative Appellate Court at Bombay, Bench at Nagpur, on 30.09.2005. The Society then filed the present writ petition. The respondent, a permanent resident of Madhya Pradesh, was not on the membership list according to the Society, but the courts below relied on documents marked as Article A (membership list) and Article B (allotment letter dated 16.01.1984). The High Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, found no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact and dismissed the petition with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Dispute under Section 91 - Membership and Allotment - The Cooperative Court directed the Society to execute a transfer deed and deliver possession of Plot No.14 to the disputant upon payment of requisite amount on par with other members - The Appellate Court confirmed the order - The High Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Cooperative Court and Appellate Court correctly directed the petitioner Society to execute a transfer deed and deliver possession of Plot No.14 to the respondent disputant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition with no order as to costs, upholding the concurrent findings of the courts below.

Law Points

  • Cooperative Court jurisdiction under Section 91
  • Appeal under Section 97
  • Membership rights
  • Allotment of plot
  • Execution of sale deed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (01) 124

Writ Petition No. 203/2006

2015-01-08

R. K. Deshpande

Shri D.V. Siras for Petitioner; None for respondent

Vishwabharti Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Limited

Shri Vinayak Shankarrao Parkhe

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging concurrent judgments of Cooperative Court and Appellate Court directing the petitioner Society to execute transfer deed and deliver possession of a plot.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner Society sought to quash the judgments and orders of the Cooperative Court and Appellate Court.

Filing Reason

The Society was aggrieved by the direction to transfer Plot No.14 to the respondent disputant, claiming the respondent was not a member and the documents relied upon were not proved.

Previous Decisions

Cooperative Court in Dispute Case No. 476/1990 directed transfer and possession; Appellate Court in Appeal No. 88/1994 dismissed the Society's appeal on 30.09.2005.

Issues

Whether the Cooperative Court and Appellate Court erred in directing the Society to execute a transfer deed and deliver possession of Plot No.14 to the respondent.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the respondent is a permanent resident of Madhya Pradesh, not a member of the Society, and the documents (Article A and Article B) were not proved.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact by the Cooperative Court and Appellate Court, and therefore declined to interfere under writ jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

The decree has been passed by the Cooperative Court, Nagpur directing the allotment of Plot No.14 to the respondent-disputant and to execute the sale deed in his favour. The Appellate Court has maintained the judgment and decree passed by the Cooperative Court.

Procedural History

Dispute Case No. 476/1990 filed under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act; Cooperative Court passed judgment on 11.07.1994; Society filed Appeal No. 88/1994 under Section 97; Appellate Court dismissed appeal on 30.09.2005; Society filed Writ Petition No. 203/2006 in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 91, Section 97
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. Time Was Not the Essence of Contract, but Plaintiff's Conduct Showed Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Hence De...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the...