Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion and SC/ST Roster Maintenance in Insurance Company. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to promotion or roster maintenance under the Companies Act, 1956 or Insurance Act, 1938.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 143
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. S. J. Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking promotion to the post of Assistant Manager with deemed date and consequential benefits, and a direction to respondent no.1, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., to maintain a roster for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe candidates in promotions. The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste employee, was appointed as Assistant Administrative Officer (Veterinary) in 1985 and promoted to Administrative Officer (Veterinary) in 1989. He claimed to be the senior most candidate for promotion to Assistant Manager, placed at serial number 281 in the seniority list of February 1995. The petitioner argued that the respondent, being a Government company, should maintain a roster for SC/ST candidates. The court, after hearing arguments, dismissed the petition, holding that promotion is not a fundamental right and the petitioner failed to establish any legal right or statutory obligation on the respondent to maintain a roster or grant promotion. The court found no merit in the petition and did not issue any directions.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Promotion - No Fundamental Right - The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste employee, sought promotion to Assistant Manager and direction to maintain SC/ST roster. The court held that promotion is not a fundamental right and the petitioner failed to establish any legal right or statutory obligation on the respondent to maintain roster or grant promotion. (Paras 1-3)

B) Companies Act, 1956 - Government Company - Roster Maintenance - The respondent being a Government company is not bound to maintain roster for SC/ST in promotions in absence of any statutory or contractual provision. The court found no merit in the petition. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to promotion to the post of Assistant Manager with deemed date and benefits, and whether the respondent insurance company is required to maintain a roster for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe candidates in promotions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Promotion is not a fundamental right
  • no legal right to roster maintenance in absence of statutory rules
  • seniority alone does not entitle promotion
  • writ petition not maintainable for contractual matters
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 116

Writ Petition No.1629/1998

2014-12-16

A. B. Chaudhari, P. R. Bora

Ms K. K. Pathak for petitioner, Mr. M. M. Sudame for respondent nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5

Dr. S. J. Kamble

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking promotion and roster maintenance for SC/ST candidates

Remedy Sought

Promotion to the post of Assistant Manager with deemed date and benefits, and direction to maintain SC/ST roster

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed he was senior most and entitled to promotion, and that respondent failed to maintain roster for SC/ST candidates

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to promotion to the post of Assistant Manager with deemed date and benefits? Whether the respondent is required to maintain a roster for SC/ST candidates in promotions?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he belongs to Scheduled Caste, is qualified with multiple degrees, and is senior most for promotion; respondent being a Government company should maintain SC/ST roster. Respondent argued that there is no legal right to promotion or roster maintenance.

Ratio Decidendi

Promotion is not a fundamental right and the petitioner failed to establish any legal right or statutory obligation on the respondent to maintain a roster or grant promotion.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present petition, the petitioner Dr. Kamble, has prayed for promotion to the post of Assistant Manager with deemed date and consequent benefits thereupon, inter alia, to direct respondent no.1 to maintain Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe roster in the matter of promotion.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 1998, reserved on 21.11.2014, and judgment pronounced on 16.12.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956:
  • Insurance Act, 1938:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Review Petition by Zilla Parishad — Unexplained Delay of 3 Years and 3 Months Not Condonable. Local Self-Government's Clumsy Decision-Making Process Not Sufficient Cause for Inordinate Delay.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Revokes Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Suit for Recovery of Loan Facilities — Defendant No. 5's Application Allowed as No Cause of Action Arose Within Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction Under Clause XII of Let...