Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. State's Appeal Dismissed as Dying Declarations Contradict Each Other and Lack Corroboration Under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 120
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 25.09.1995 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1992, acquitting the respondent-accused Soma Laxman Nikam for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case was that the deceased, a deserted married woman residing with her parents at Fekari, was set on fire by the accused on 14.08.1991 around 2:30 PM following a dispute over a house purchase. The deceased died on 15.08.1991. Two dying declarations were recorded: one by a Police Head Constable (Exhibit-28) and another by an Executive Magistrate (Exhibit-35). The Sessions Judge acquitted the accused, leading to the present appeal. The prosecution examined 12 witnesses. The court found that the two dying declarations were inconsistent with each other regarding the cause of the fire and the role of the accused. The first dying declaration (Exhibit-28) allegedly stated that the accused set her on fire, while the second (Exhibit-35) did not implicate the accused. The court held that such inconsistencies create doubt and the benefit must go to the accused. The appeal was dismissed, and the acquittal was upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Inconsistency - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The prosecution relied on two dying declarations which were inconsistent with each other regarding the cause of fire and the role of the accused. The court held that such inconsistencies create doubt and the benefit must go to the accused. The acquittal was upheld as the dying declarations were not reliable and lacked corroboration. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquittal of the accused for the offence of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable in law, given the alleged dying declarations and other evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and order of acquittal dated 25.09.1995 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1992 is upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Corroboration
  • Inconsistency
  • Acquittal
  • Section 302 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 3

Criminal Appeal No. 368 of 1995

2014-12-24

S.S. Shinde, N.W. Sambre

Mr. S.D. Kaldate (APP for Petitioner – State), Mr. A.R. Syed h/f Mr. S.P. Brahme (Advocate for Respondent)

The State of Maharashtra

Soma Laxman Nikam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal for murder

Remedy Sought

State sought conviction of the accused for murder under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

The State challenged the acquittal of the accused by the Sessions Court

Previous Decisions

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon acquitted the accused on 25.09.1995 in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1992

Issues

Whether the dying declarations are reliable and consistent? Whether the acquittal is sustainable in law?

Submissions/Arguments

The State argued that the dying declarations clearly implicate the accused and the acquittal is erroneous. The respondent argued that the dying declarations are inconsistent and the acquittal is correct.

Ratio Decidendi

Inconsistent dying declarations create doubt and the benefit of doubt must go to the accused. Acquittal is sustainable when the prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

This Appeal is filed by the State, challenging the Judgment and Order of acquittal dated 25.09.1995 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1992, thereby acquitting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under: The deceased [a deserted married woman] was residing with her parents at Fekari. ... Due to this, accused on 14.08.1991 around 2.30 set the deceased on fire resulting in her death. Two dying declarations were recorded; one by Police Head Constable and other by Executive Magistrate. The Sessions Judge by Judgment dated 25.09.1995 acquitted the accused of charges.

Procedural History

The trial court (4th Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon) acquitted the accused on 25.09.1995. The State filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court on an unspecified date. The appeal was reserved on 15.12.2014 and pronounced on 24.12.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Transferring Investigation to NIA in West Bengal Bomb Incidents — State Police Investigation Upheld as Adequate. High Court's reliance on alleged bomb use and handwriting similarity found insufficient to warra...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if...