Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher with 50% Back Wages. Termination Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal, Reinstatement Upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 100
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Gurukul Shikshan Sanstha, a registered Public Trust running Dnyaneshwar Pawar Junior College, terminated the services of respondent no.1, Eknath Rameshwar Raurale, a teacher, with effect from 18.2.2013 by an order dated 16.2.2013. Respondent no.1 challenged the termination before the School Tribunal, Amravati Division, which partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the termination as illegal and directing reinstatement with 50% back wages from 18.4.2013 till reinstatement, and continuity of service. The Management filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the Tribunal's order. The High Court examined the facts and found that the Management had terminated the teacher's services without obtaining prior approval from the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training, as required under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The court held that such termination without prior approval is illegal and void ab initio. The court also noted that the Tribunal had considered the facts and circumstances and awarded 50% back wages, which was not perverse. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the Tribunal's order. The court directed the Management to comply with the order within four weeks, failing which respondent no.1 would be entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the arrears of back wages.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Service - Prior Approval - Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The Management terminated the services of a teacher without obtaining prior approval from the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training. The School Tribunal set aside the termination as illegal and ordered reinstatement with 50% back wages. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order, holding that termination without prior approval is illegal and void ab initio. (Paras 2-5)

B) Service Law - Reinstatement and Back Wages - Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - The School Tribunal directed reinstatement with 50% back wages from 18.4.2013 till reinstatement. The High Court found no perversity in the order and dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal's discretion in awarding back wages. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of respondent no.1's service by the petitioner/Management without prior approval of the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is legal and valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the School Tribunal's order dated 30.1.2014. The Management was directed to comply with the order within four weeks, failing which respondent no.1 would be entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the arrears of back wages.

Law Points

  • Termination of service without prior approval of the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training is illegal
  • Reinstatement with back wages is permissible under Section 5 of the MEPS Act
  • 1977
  • School Tribunal has jurisdiction to order reinstatement and back wages
  • Absence of prior approval renders termination void ab initio
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (09) 143

WRIT PETITION NO.2681 OF 2014

2014-09-02

A.P. Bhangale, J.

Mr.J.T.Gilda, Adv. with Mr.A.J.Gilda, Adv. for the Petitioner, Mr.A.Z.Jibhkate, Adv. for Respondent no.1, Mr.D.M.Kale, Adv. for Respondent no.2

Gurukul Shikshan Sanstha and Dnyaneshwar Pawar Junior College

Eknath s/o Rameshwar Raurale and Deputy Director Vocational Education And Training

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the School Tribunal which set aside termination of a teacher and ordered reinstatement with back wages.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner/Management sought to quash and set aside the Judgment and Order dated 30.1.2014 passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati Division, Amravati.

Filing Reason

The Management terminated the services of respondent no.1 without prior approval of the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training, which was challenged by respondent no.1 before the School Tribunal.

Previous Decisions

The School Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, set aside termination as illegal, directed reinstatement with 50% back wages from 18.4.2013 till reinstatement, and continuity of service.

Issues

Whether the termination of respondent no.1's service by the petitioner/Management without prior approval of the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training under Section 5 of the MEPS Act, 1977 is legal and valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner/Management argued that the termination was justified and the Tribunal's order was erroneous. Respondent no.1 argued that the termination was illegal as no prior approval was obtained.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of service of a teacher without prior approval of the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is illegal and void ab initio. The School Tribunal has the jurisdiction to order reinstatement with back wages in such cases.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner/Management has prayed to quash and set aside Judgment and Order dt. 30.1.2014 passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati Division, Amravati, whereby the appeal filed by respondent no.1 herein/ Shri Eknath Rameshwar Raurale challenging termination of his service with effect from 18.2.2013 by an Order issued by the petitioners dt. 16.2.2013 was partly allowed. Termination of service with effect from 18.2.2013 was set aside as illegal. The case of the petitioner is that it runs Dyaneshwar Pawar Junior College (Arts, Commerce & M.C.V.C.), Bhatkuli Jain, Tah. Bhatkuli, District Amravati.

Procedural History

Respondent no.1 was terminated on 16.2.2013 with effect from 18.2.2013. He filed an appeal before the School Tribunal, Amravati Division, which partly allowed the appeal on 30.1.2014, setting aside termination and ordering reinstatement with 50% back wages. The Management filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was dismissed on 2.9.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977: Section 5
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Lack of Public View Requirement Under SC-ST Act. "Mere Presence in an Office Room Does Not Constitute Public View" – SC Clarifies Scope of Atrocities Under SC-ST Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Maharashtra Money Lending Act, 2014: Quashing of FIR Based on Isolated Transaction. Bombay High Court quashes FIR as there was no continuous activity to constitute money lending business under the Maharashtra Money Lending Act, 2014.