Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous Due to Expiry of Elected Term of Municipal Council. Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Election Rules Left Open for Future Consideration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 31
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Abdul Rahim Abdul Karim Bagwan, a councilor of the Municipal Council, Manvat, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 2(A)(b)(i) and Clause (i) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat (President Election) Rules. However, during the pendency of the petition, the elected term of the office bearers and members of the Municipal Council came to an end. The court observed that this development rendered the challenge infructuous. Consequently, the court did not take up the constitutional validity issue for consideration. The petition was disposed of as infructuous, with liberty granted to the petitioner or any other person to raise the same challenge in an appropriate petition if an occasion arises. The rule was discharged, and no order as to costs was made.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Infructuous Petition - Expiry of Elected Term - The challenge raised in the writ petition became infructuous as the elected term of office bearers and members of the Municipal Council had already come to an end. The court declined to consider the constitutional validity of the impugned rules and disposed of the petition as infructuous, granting liberty to raise the challenge in an appropriate petition if occasion arises. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the challenge to the constitutional validity of Rule 2(A)(b)(i) and Clause (i) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat (President Election) Rules survives after the expiry of the elected term of the Municipal Council.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. Liberty granted to raise challenge in appropriate petition if occasion arises.

Law Points

  • Writ petition becomes infructuous when the elected term of office bearers and members of the Municipal Council has come to an end
  • Challenge to constitutional validity of rules not considered due to infructuousness
  • Liberty granted to raise challenge in appropriate proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (09) 14

WRIT PETITION NO.3108 of 2009

2014-09-11

R.M. Borde, V.K. Jadhav

Mr. P.B. Gapat for petitioner, Mr. V.D. Godbharle A.G.P. for Respondent No.1, Mr. S.T. Shelke for respondent No.3, Mr. M.P. Tripathi for respondent No.4

Abdul Rahim Abdul Karim Bagwan

The State of Maharashtra, The Collector, Parbhani, The State Election Commission, The Manvat Municipal Council

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging constitutional validity of election rules

Remedy Sought

Challenge to the constitutional validity of Rule 2(A)(b)(i) and Clause (i) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat (President Election) Rules

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a councilor, challenged the validity of certain election rules

Issues

Whether the challenge to the constitutional validity of the election rules survives after the expiry of the elected term of the Municipal Council

Ratio Decidendi

A writ petition challenging election rules becomes infructuous when the elected term of the municipal council has expired, and the court will not consider the constitutional validity of the rules in such a situation.

Judgment Excerpts

The elected term of office bearers of the Municipal Council and members of the Municipal Council has already come to an end thereby rendering the challenge raised in the instant petition infructuous. So far as challenge raised to the constitutional validity of the provisions of Rule 2(A)(b)(i) and Clause (i) of The Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat (President Election) Rules is concerned, the same is not taken up for consideration in the instant petition and it would be open for the petitioner or any other person to raise identical challenge in an appropriate petition if occasion arises.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.3108 of 2009 challenging the constitutional validity of certain election rules. During the pendency of the petition, the elected term of the Municipal Council expired. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous on 11 September 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat (President Election) Rules: Rule 2(A)(b)(i), Clause (i)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous Due to Expiry of Elected Term of Municipal Council. Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Election Rules Left Open for Future Consideration.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Labour Court's Finding on Misconduct Not Final, Single Judge Erred in Setting It Aside. The Division Bench held that the finding on issue No. 4 was not a final determinatio...