Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty in Domestic Violence Case. Life imprisonment confirmed for killing wife with stick after quarrel over food preparation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shivaji @ Shivling Nagendra Gatade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaisingpur, for the murder of his wife, Surekha @ Pinkutai, under Section 302 IPC and for cruelty under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution case was that on 12 November 2009, around 10 p.m., the appellant assaulted his wife with a stick on her head following a quarrel over food preparation, causing her death on the spot. The first information report was lodged by PW2 Balasaheb Gawarai at Kurundwad Police Station at 11:05 p.m. The investigation was conducted by PW15 API Supe, who recorded statements, conducted inquest panchanama, and recovered the weapon of offence. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of the stick. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the prosecution had established the chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the appellant and deceased had frequent quarrels, and on the day of the incident, the appellant was seen with the deceased shortly before her death. The medical evidence confirmed that the death was due to head injuries caused by a blunt object. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC and Section 498A IPC, and confirmed the sentence of life imprisonment and three years rigorous imprisonment respectively, with fines. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Circumstantial Evidence - Conviction based on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapon - Appellant convicted for murder of his wife by assaulting her with a stick - Court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed to the guilt of the accused (Paras 1-10).

B) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498A Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Persistent quarrels over food preparation - Evidence of cruelty established through testimony of witnesses - Court upheld conviction under Section 498A (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 498A IPC confirmed.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Cruelty
  • Domestic Violence
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Last Seen Theory
  • Motive
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (08) 68

Criminal Appeal No. 847 of 2012

2014-08-07

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, A.S. Gadkari

Smt. Sarojini Upadhyay (appointed) for Appellant, Smt. V.R. Bhonsale, A.P.P. for Respondent-State

Shivaji @ Shivling Nagendra Gatade

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and cruelty.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court for murder of his wife and cruelty.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Sections 302 and 498A IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment and 3 years rigorous imprisonment respectively.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on circumstantial evidence. Whether the conviction under Section 498A IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and circumstantial. Respondent argued that the chain of circumstances was complete and proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

The chain of circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon was complete and pointed to the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant, original accused, has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order dated 17th March 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jaisingpur, District Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 3 of 2010, thereby convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code...

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaisingpur on 17 March 2012. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which heard the appeal and dismissed it on 7 August 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 498A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Landowner's Challenge to Acquisition Under Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 Due to Substantial Procedural Compliance. The Court upheld the acquisition, finding that objections were considered and the Highways Department's respons...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Auction Dispute: Mandatory Deposit Under Section 28 of Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 Must Be Made Within 30 Days. The Court held that the Certificate Officer cannot extend the time for deposit be...