Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Following Settlement Between Spouses — Compromise Reached Under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC. The court held that quashing the FIR was necessary to secure the ends of justice as the parties had amicably resolved their differences and the wife had no objection.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, who were family members of the husband (applicant No.1), filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of Crime No.345/2012 registered at Police Station Shirpur, District Dhule, for offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The FIR was lodged by respondent No.2, Usha w/o Anand Birhade, the wife of applicant No.1, alleging cruelty, criminal breach of trust, assault, intentional insult, and criminal intimidation. During the pendency of the application, the parties amicably settled their matrimonial dispute. The wife, respondent No.2, appeared before the court and stated that she had no objection to the quashing of the FIR. The court noted that the dispute was essentially matrimonial and the parties had resolved their differences. The court also considered that applicant No.2 (father) had died, and applicants No.1 and 3 had withdrawn the application. The court, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings to secure the ends of justice, holding that continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. The application was allowed in respect of applicants No.4 to 9.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - Matrimonial Dispute - Settlement - The applicants sought quashing of FIR registered for offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and the wife (respondent No.2) had no objection to quashing. The court, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, noting that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-6)

B) Indian Penal Code - Matrimonial Cruelty - Section 498A IPC - Compromise - The court considered that the dispute was essentially matrimonial and the parties had resolved their differences. The wife stated that she did not wish to pursue the complaint. The court held that quashing the FIR was appropriate to maintain peace and harmony between the parties. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings in Crime No.345/2012 for offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC in light of the settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed Crime No.345/2012 registered at Police Station Shirpur, District Dhule, and all consequential proceedings, in respect of applicants No.4 to 9. The application was dismissed as withdrawn for applicants No.1 and 3, and abated for applicant No.2 due to his death.

Law Points

  • Section 482 CrPC
  • inherent powers
  • quashing of FIR
  • matrimonial dispute
  • settlement
  • compromise
  • Section 498A IPC
  • Section 406 IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (08) 5

Criminal Application No.3272 of 2013

2014-08-05

S.S. Shinde, P.R. Bora

Mr. Jaware Vishnu M. (for applicants), Mr. G.K. ThigaleNaik (APP for State), Mr. Katneshwarkar P.R. (for respondent No.2)

Anand s/o Pundalik Birhade and others

The State of Maharashtra and Usha w/o Anand Birhade

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Crime No.345/2012 and all consequential proceedings

Filing Reason

The applicants, being relatives of the husband, sought quashing of FIR lodged by the wife alleging offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute.

Issues

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC in light of the settlement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants submitted that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and the wife had no objection to quashing of the FIR. The wife (respondent No.2) stated that she did not wish to pursue the complaint and had no objection to quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that when the parties to a matrimonial dispute have amicably settled their differences and the complainant has no objection to quashing, the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash the FIR to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

The application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying therein to quash and set aside the Crime No.345/2012 dated 30.11.2012 registered at Police Station, Shirpur... The learned Counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw this criminal application on behalf of applicants No.1 and 3. The learned Counsel for the applicants informs that the applicant No.2 died on 21st November, 2013. Hence, the application stood abated as against applicant No.2. It is the case of the applicants that, the applicants No.2 and 3 respectively are father and mother of the applicant No.1. The respondent No.2 is present in the Court. She states that she has no objection for quashing the FIR. In the light of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Procedural History

The criminal application was filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR. During hearing, applicants No.1 and 3 withdrew the application, applicant No.2 died, and the matter proceeded for applicants No.4 to 9. The court heard the parties and passed the order on 5th August 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Following Settlement Between Spouses — Compromise Reached Under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC. The court held that quashing the FIR was necessary to secure the ends of justice as t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tahsildar's Partition Order Under Section 54 CPC — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Execution of Civil Court Decree. The court upheld the Tahsildar's order effecting partition of suit property p...