High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge Against Collector's Dismissal of Disqualification Petition — Collector Held Formation of Post-Poll Aghadi Permissible Under Section 63(2B) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act. Independent Councillors Allegedly Violated Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act by Forming Aghadi After Election, but Collector Found No Disqualification.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter arose from elections to the Municipal Council, Yawal, held on December 12, 2011, wherein ten respondents were elected as independent councillors. On the same day, they convened a meeting and formed 'Yawal Shahar Vikas Aghadi,' resolving to register it and appoint respondent No. 1 as its leader. They submitted a constitution and declarations to the District Collector, Jalgaon, for registration. The petitioner, who was also a councillor elected from Khandesh Vikas Aghadi, filed Disqualification Petition No. 26 of 2011 on December 22, 2011, alleging that the independent councillors had incurred disqualification under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986 (MLAMD Act) by joining an Aghadi after their election. The petitioner contended that Section 3(2) prohibits an elected independent councillor from joining any political party or Aghadi after the election, and that the respondents' formation of a post-poll Aghadi violated this provision, leading to immediate disqualification. The Collector issued notices on December 26, 2011, and the respondents appeared and filed preliminary objections. They argued that the disqualification petition was defective, lacking proper verification and affidavit as required under the MLAMD Rules, 1987 and the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. They also contended that the petition did not disclose personal satisfaction of the petitioner as mandated by the Rules. On the merits, the respondents asserted that the formation of the Aghadi was permissible under the second proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965, which allowed independent councillors to form their own Aghadi. The Collector, after scrutinizing the petition and documents, upheld its maintainability, finding compliance with the Rules. On the substantive issue, the Collector considered the amendment to Section 63(2B) of the Municipal Councils Act and concluded that independent councillors could form an Aghadi after election without joining any existing political party, and therefore no disqualification was incurred under the MLAMD Act. Consequently, the Collector dismissed the disqualification petition on April 30, 2012. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 5247 of 2012 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the Collector's order and a declaration that the respondents stand disqualified. The High Court heard arguments on February 26 and April 23, 2014, and reserved judgment. The provided judgment text is incomplete and does not include the High Court's final decision.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Disqualification of Elected Councillors - Sections 3(2), 9 of Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986; Section 63(2B) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - The Collector dismissed the disqualification petition holding that independent councillors are permitted to form a post-poll Aghadi under the second proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Municipal Councils Act, and thus no disqualification is incurred under Section 3(2) of the MLAMD Act. The writ petition challenges this finding. (Paras 15-18)

B) Disqualification Petition - Procedure - Rules 6, 7(2) of Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - The Collector, after scrutiny, held that the disqualification petition was filed in compliance with the Rules, rejecting preliminary objections regarding defects in verification and affidavit under Order VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (Para 14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether independent councillors who form a post-poll aghadi incur disqualification under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986, and whether the Collector's dismissal of the disqualification petition based on the second proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act
  • 1986 prohibits an independent councillor from joining any political party or aghadi after election
  • second proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils
  • Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act
  • 1965 permits independent councillors to form an aghadi
  • disqualification petition must comply with Rules 6 and 7(2) of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules
  • 1987
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (05) 16

Writ Petition No. 5247 of 2012

2014-05-09

Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.

P.M. Shah, A.N. Sabnis, S.P. Shah for petitioner; D.B. Bhange for State; V.J. Dixit, A.B. Girase for respondents 1,3,6-8,10; V.J. Dixit, Y.B. Bokar for respondents 2,5,9; D.S. Bagul for respondent 11

Shobha Dipak Behde

Umakant Reva Fegade & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Collector's order dismissing a disqualification petition under the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Collector's order dated 30-04-2012 and a declaration that the respondents stand disqualified under Section 3(2) of the MLAMD Act.

Filing Reason

The Collector dismissed the disqualification petition on the ground that formation of a post-poll Aghadi was permissible under the second proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

Previous Decisions

The Collector dismissed the disqualification petition on 30-04-2012.

Issues

Whether independent councillors who form a post-poll Aghadi incur disqualification under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986? Whether the Collector's dismissal of the disqualification petition on the basis of the second proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 is valid?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that formation of Aghadi after election by independent councillors violates Section 3(2) of MLAMD Act, which prohibits joining any political party or Aghadi after election, leading to immediate disqualification. Respondents contended that the disqualification petition was defective as it lacked proper verification and affidavit as required under MLAMD Rules and CPC. Respondents further argued that the second proviso to Section 63(2B) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 permits independent councillors to form their own Aghadi, and therefore no disqualification arises.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 3 (2) An elected councillor, or as the case may be, member who has been elected as such otherwise than as a candidate set up by any political party or Aghadi or front shall be disqualified for being a councillor, or as the case may be, a member if he joins any political party or Aghadi or front after such election. The collector, on taking into account the contentions and pleadings of the parties, has considered that the respondents have been elected as independent councillors and said elected councillors without joining any party have on their own formed an Aghadi . The Aghadi is registered. Such an Aghadi can be formed by candidates under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Township Act, 1965.

Procedural History

Election results for Municipal Council, Yawal declared on 12-12-2011. Ten independent councillors formed 'Yawal Shahar Vikas Aghadi' on the same day and submitted declarations for registration to the Collector on 13-12-2011. Petitioner filed Disqualification Petition No. 26 of 2011 before the District Collector, Jalgaon on 22-12-2011. Notices issued to respondents on 26-12-2011. Respondents filed preliminary objections. Collector dismissed petition on 30-04-2012. Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 5247 of 2012 before the High Court. Hearing held on 26-02-2014 and 23-04-2014; judgment reserved.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Local Authority Members’ Disqualification Act, 1986: Section 3(2), Section 9
  • Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987: Rule 6, Rule 7, Rule 7(2)
  • Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965: Section 63(2B)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order VI Rule 4, Order VI Rule 15
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge Against Collector's Dismissal of Disqualification Petition — Collector Held Formation of Post-Poll Aghadi Permissible Under Section 63(2B) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act. Independent Council...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Partition Suit — Appellant Absent Despite Adjournments. Failure to Appear Leads to Dismissal Under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC.