Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate as Time-Barred. Petition filed 12 years after knowledge of probate held to be barred by limitation under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 133
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, daughter and widow of the deceased Vithal Shyamdas Jhaveri, filed a Miscellaneous Petition in 2012 seeking revocation of the probate granted in 1996 in respect of the deceased's Will dated 12th October 1992. The respondent, who claimed to be the sole executor, had obtained probate without serving citation on the petitioners, who were legal heirs. The petitioners alleged that they came to know of the probate only in November 2000 through correspondence. The respondent raised a preliminary objection of limitation, arguing that the petition was filed beyond the three-year period prescribed under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court examined the correspondence between the parties' advocates in November and December 2000, which clearly showed that the petitioners had knowledge of the probate at that time. The court held that the right to apply for revocation accrued in November 2000, and the petition filed in 2012 was grossly delayed and barred by limitation. The court dismissed the petition as not maintainable.

Headnote

A) Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 137 - Revocation of Probate - Limitation Period - Petition for revocation of probate must be filed within three years from the date when the right to apply accrues, i.e., from the date of knowledge of the probate - Petitioners had knowledge of probate in November 2000 but filed petition in 2012 - Held that the petition is barred by limitation and gross delay (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petition for revocation of probate filed in 2012 is barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, given that the petitioners had knowledge of the probate in 2000.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition for revocation of probate is dismissed as barred by limitation and not maintainable.

Law Points

  • Limitation for revocation of probate
  • Article 137 of Limitation Act
  • 1963
  • Knowledge of probate
  • Delay and laches
  • Service of citation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (04) 166

Miscellaneous Petition No. 85 of 2012 in Petition No. 214 of 1994

2014-04-29

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

2014:BHC-OS:4627

Ms.Soma Singh, a/w. Mr.Subro Dev, i/b. Mr.Vivek Sharma for the Petitioners; Ms.Subhasree Chatterjee, i/b. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for the Respondent

Ms.Uma Vithal Jhaveri and Meena Vithal Jhaveri

Nikhil Vithal Jhaveri

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition for revocation of probate granted in 1996.

Remedy Sought

Revocation of probate granted in Probate Petition No. 214 of 1994.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that probate was obtained without serving citation on them, who are legal heirs.

Previous Decisions

Probate was granted on 30th December, 1996 in Probate Petition No. 214 of 1994.

Issues

Whether the petition for revocation of probate is barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they had no knowledge of probate until November 2000 and filed petition in 2012. Respondent argued that petitioners had knowledge in November 2000 and petition is time-barred.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to apply for revocation of probate accrues from the date of knowledge of the probate. Under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the petition must be filed within three years from that date. Since petitioners had knowledge in November 2000 and filed in 2012, the petition is barred by limitation.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, petitioners seek that the probate granted by this court on 30th December, 1996 in Probate Petition No. 214 of 1994 of the deceased Vithal Shyamdas Jhaveri be revoked. Respondent at the outset raised issue of limitation in filing this Misc. Petition.

Procedural History

Probate was granted on 30th December, 1996. Petitioners sent notice on 7th November, 2000. Respondent replied on 16th November, 2000 informing of probate. Petitioners replied on 20th December, 2000. Misc. Petition filed in 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Limitation Act, 1963: Article 137
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 188...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Public Works Department Against Industrial Court Order Granting Holiday Benefits to Field Staff. Employees Entitled to 2nd and 4th Saturday Holidays and Overtime Pay Under Kalelkar Award Despite Government Resolution...