Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Corruption Case Against District Agriculture Officer from Nandurbar to Nashik on Grounds of Safety and Convenience. Transfer of Special Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 granted under Section 407 CrPC to ensure fair trial and avoid prejudice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sanjay Babasaheb Deshmukh, was working as District Agriculture Officer at Nandurbar when a chargesheet was filed against him based on a trap laid under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Special Case No.21 of 2013 was pending before the Special Judge, Nandurbar. The applicant filed an application under Section 407 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking transfer of the case from Nandurbar to Nashik. The grounds for transfer were that the applicant had previously worked at Nandurbar and had developed enmity with local persons, leading to threats to his life and property. He also submitted that it would be inconvenient for him to attend court at Nandurbar due to the distance and safety concerns. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant's family resides in Nashik and that he had been suspended from service, making it difficult to travel to Nandurbar. The State, represented by the APP, did not oppose the transfer. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the transfer was justified to ensure the safety and convenience of the applicant and to avoid any prejudice. The court allowed the application and directed the transfer of Special Case No.21 of 2013 from the Special Judge, Nandurbar to the Special Judge, Nashik. The court also directed that the applicant shall appear before the transferee court on 16th June 2014.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Case - Section 407 read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Transfer of Special Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Applicant sought transfer from Nandurbar to Nashik citing safety concerns and inconvenience as he was previously posted at Nandurbar and faced threats - Court allowed transfer to ensure fair trial and convenience of parties - Held that transfer is warranted to avoid prejudice and ensure safety (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Special Case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 should be transferred from Nandurbar to Nashik on grounds of convenience and safety of the applicant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. Special Case No.21 of 2013 pending before the Special Judge, Nandurbar is transferred to the Special Judge, Nashik. The applicant shall appear before the transferee court on 16th June 2014.

Law Points

  • Transfer of criminal cases
  • Section 407 CrPC
  • convenience of parties
  • safety concerns
  • Prevention of Corruption Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (04) 34

Criminal Application No.290 of 2014

2014-04-29

A.I.S. Cheema

N.B. Suryawanshi h/f Amarjeet V. Patil for Petitioner, Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar, A.P.P. for Respondent

Sanjay Babasaheb Deshmukh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for transfer of a special case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 from one court to another.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Special Case No.21 of 2013 from the Special Judge, Nandurbar to the Special Judge, Nashik.

Filing Reason

Applicant faced threats and inconvenience due to his previous posting at Nandurbar and enmity with local persons.

Issues

Whether the Special Case under the Prevention of Corruption Act should be transferred from Nandurbar to Nashik on grounds of safety and convenience.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant submitted that he was working as District Agriculture Officer at Nandurbar when chargesheet was filed, and he has developed enmity with local persons, leading to threats to his life and property. He also submitted that it is inconvenient to attend court at Nandurbar as his family resides in Nashik and he is under suspension. Respondent State did not oppose the transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of a criminal case under Section 407 CrPC is warranted when there are reasonable grounds of safety and convenience for the accused, especially when the accused had previous enmity with local persons and faces threats, and the prosecution does not oppose the transfer.

Judgment Excerpts

This Application is filed under Section 407 read with 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for transfer of the Special Case. Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that the Applicant was working as District Agriculture Officer at Nandurbar when chargesheet came to be filed on the basis of trap laid under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Application is allowed. Special Case No.21 of 2013 pending before the Special Judge, Nandurbar is transferred to the Special Judge, Nashik.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No.290 of 2014 under Section 407 read with Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking transfer of Special Case No.21 of 2013 from Nandurbar to Nashik. The court admitted the application and heard both sides, then allowed the transfer.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 407, 482
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Corruption Case Against District Agriculture Officer from Nandurbar to Nashik on Grounds of Safety and Convenience. Transfer of Special Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 granted under Section 407 CrPC ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Waqf Property Dispute for Non-Compliance with Section 89 of Waqf Act, 1995. Suit for Injunction Against Deputy Collector Barred as Statutory Notice Under Section 89 Not Served Before Filing Suit.