Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Widow and Children for Full Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Case. Divorced First Wife Held Not Entitled to Share as Divorce Under Buddhist Customs Valid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 118
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from the death of Kishore Tode, a Senior Overman with Western Coal Fields, who died in a workplace accident on 4 June 2009 when a heap of sand collapsed and buried him. His body was recovered on 12 June 2009. The employer deposited compensation of Rs. 3,51,080 with the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The appellants, being the widow (appellant No.1) and three minor children (appellants No.2-4) of the deceased, filed an application under Section 8(4) of the Act for distribution of the compensation. They claimed that the respondent, Vandana, was the first wife of the deceased but had been divorced on 22 May 1996 as per Buddhist customs, and had been living separately for 14 years. The Commissioner, however, held that the divorce was not proved and directed equal distribution among the four claimants, including the respondent. The appellants appealed against this order and also against the subsequent order refusing revision. The High Court examined the evidence, including a divorce deed (Exh.28) and testimony of witnesses, and found that the divorce was validly performed as per Buddhist customs. The court noted that the respondent had not challenged the divorce deed or the evidence. The court held that the respondent ceased to be a wife and was not a dependent of the deceased. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Commissioner's orders, and directed that the entire compensation be distributed among the appellants only.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Distribution of Compensation - Section 8(4) Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Divorce under Buddhist Customs - The issue was whether a divorced wife is entitled to compensation as a dependent. The court held that the divorce was valid as per Buddhist customs and the respondent ceased to be a wife, thus not a dependent. The compensation was directed to be distributed solely among the appellants, the widow and children of the deceased. (Paras 1-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent, who was divorced by the deceased as per Buddhist customs, is entitled to a share in the compensation amount deposited under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Orders dated 08/11/2011 and 20/9/2012 set aside. The entire compensation amount of Rs. 3,51,080 with accrued interest shall be distributed among the appellants only.

Law Points

  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
  • Section 8(4)
  • distribution of compensation
  • divorce under Buddhist customs
  • validity of divorce
  • dependents' entitlement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (01) 140

First Appeal No. 544 of 2013

2014-01-09

S. B. Shukre, J.

Mr. M. P. Khajanchi for the appellants, Mr. F. G. Isaac for the respondent

Smt. Varsha wd/o Kishore Tode, Ku. Sheetal d/o Kishore Tode, Ku. Anshu d/o Kishore Tode, Master Gunjan s/o Kishore Tode

Smt. Vandana Kishore Tode

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 regarding distribution of compensation.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought that the entire compensation be distributed to them, excluding the respondent who was divorced.

Filing Reason

The Commissioner had directed equal distribution of compensation among the appellants and the respondent, despite the respondent being divorced.

Previous Decisions

Commissioner passed order on 08/11/2011 in D.W.C.A. No.12/2009 directing equal distribution, and on 20/9/2012 refused to revise or modify that order.

Issues

Whether the divorce between the deceased and the respondent was valid as per Buddhist customs. Whether the respondent is entitled to a share in the compensation as a dependent.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the respondent was divorced on 22/5/1996 as per Buddhist customs and had been living separately for 14 years, thus not a dependent. Respondent argued that the divorce was not proved and she remained a wife entitled to compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

A divorce validly performed as per the customs of the parties' religion (Buddhist) dissolves the marriage, and the divorced spouse ceases to be a 'wife' and is not a dependent entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Judgment Excerpts

The divorce deed (Exh.28) clearly shows that the deceased and the respondent had divorced each other as per the usages and customs of Buddhist religion. The respondent has not challenged the divorce deed or the evidence of the witnesses. The respondent ceased to be a wife of the deceased and was not a dependent.

Procedural History

The employer deposited compensation with the Commissioner. Appellants filed application under Section 8(4) for distribution. Commissioner passed order on 08/11/2011 directing equal distribution among four claimants including respondent. Appellants sought revision, which was refused on 20/9/2012. Appellants then filed this first appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 8(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeals in Decree and Partition Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove title and po...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Senior Citizens Act Case Upholding Order of Maintenance for Elderly Father. Appeal by Son Against Competent Authority’s Order of Maintenance Not Maintainable as Only Aggrieved Senior Citizen Can Appeal Und...