Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Employer in Workmen's Compensation Case — Deceased Labourer's Death Held Arising Out of Employment. Sub Divisional Officer, Telegraphs, Parbhani v. Kesharbai & Ors.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 119
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Sub Divisional Officer, Telegraphs, Parbhani against an order granting compensation to the widow and children of a deceased labourer, Bhaskar Vahule. The deceased was employed as a labourer with the appellant. On 20th September 1992, he suffered injuries while working and subsequently died on 5th October 1992. The respondents, being the widow and minor children, filed a petition for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarded compensation, which was challenged by the appellant on the ground that the death did not arise out of and in the course of employment. The High Court framed the substantial question of law as whether the deceased died out of and in the course of employment. After hearing the parties, the court upheld the Commissioner's finding that the injuries were sustained during employment and the death was causally connected, thereby dismissing the appeal. The court emphasized that the evidence on record supported the causal link between the injuries and the death, and no substantial question of law arose for consideration.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Death arising out of employment - Causal connection - Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Section 3 - The court considered whether the death of a labourer occurred out of and in the course of employment. The deceased suffered injuries on 20.09.1992 while working and died on 05.10.1992. The court held that the injuries were sustained during employment and the death was causally connected to those injuries, thus the employer was liable for compensation. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether deceased Bhaskar died out of and in the course of employment as labour with the appellant on 5.10.1992 owing to injuries suffered on 20th Sept., 1992.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The court held that the deceased died out of and in the course of employment, and no substantial question of law arose.

Law Points

  • Workmen's Compensation
  • Death arising out of and in the course of employment
  • Burden of proof
  • Causal connection between injury and death
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (01) 13

First Appeal No.36 of 1997

2014-01-27

K.U. Chandiwala

Mr. Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel / ASJ, for appellant; Shri G.N. Chincholkar, Adv., for respondents

Sub Divisional Officer, Telegraphs, Parbhani

Kesharbai w/o Bhaskar Vahule, Dalit s/o Bhaskar Vahule, Tai d/o Bhaskar Vahule

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against order of Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarding compensation to widow and children of deceased labourer.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the compensation award on the ground that death did not arise out of and in the course of employment.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the Commissioner's finding that the deceased died due to injuries sustained during employment.

Previous Decisions

Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarded compensation to the respondents.

Issues

Whether deceased Bhaskar died out of and in the course of employment as labour with the appellant on 5.10.1992 owing to injuries suffered on 20th Sept., 1992.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the death did not arise out of and in the course of employment. Respondents contended that the injuries were sustained during employment and death was causally connected.

Ratio Decidendi

The death of a workman due to injuries sustained during the course of employment is compensable under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, provided there is a causal connection between the injury and the death.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether deceased Bhaskar died out of and in the course of employment as labour with the appellant on 5.10.1992 owing to injuries suffered on 20th Sept., 1992.

Procedural History

Respondents filed petition for compensation before Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation. Commissioner awarded compensation. Appellant filed First Appeal No.36 of 1997 before High Court. Appeal admitted on 28.01.1997. Heard and dismissed on 27.01.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Stay on Transfer Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Transfer of Workmen During Pendency of Industrial Disputes Constitutes Prima Facie Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Village Panchayat Clerk Denied Absorption Despite Seniority. Court directs absorption with age relaxation, holding that discrimination in supersession of seniority without justification violates service law p...