Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hears Execution Appeals Against Order of State Commission in Consumer Complaint. Appeals Pertain to Execution Proceedings in CC/12/192 Before Maharashtra State Commission Regarding Consumer Dispute.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Admin
2026-11-11 18:24:30
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

APPEAL EXECUTION NO. 68 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 35

AE 68 of 2024 & AE 91 of 2024

2025-06-10

M/s. R. P. Builders, Rita Prabhudas Vithlani, Vatsal Prabhudas Vithlani, Mitsur Prabhudas Vithlani, Neha K. Katira, M/s. Aakash Builders and Developers

Mr. Jaiprakash Lalmuni Upadhyay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Execution proceeding arising from a consumer complaint

Remedy Sought

Appellants challenge order dated 21.05.2024 in execution applications EA/18/56 and EA/18/57

Previous Decisions

Order dated 21.05.2024 in EA/18/56 and EA/18/57 in CC/12/192 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra

Procedural History

The case originated as Consumer Complaint No. CC/12/192 before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra. Execution Applications EA/18/56 and EA/18/57 were filed, and by order dated 21.05.2024, the State Commission passed an order. Aggrieved, the appellants filed Appeal Execution Nos. 68 and 91 of 2024 before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
execution consumer protection appeal

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellant's Failure to Explain Deceased's Death Strengthens Inference of Guilt. 2026-11-12 17:58:19
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of FCI Manager Challenging Disciplinary Action for Insubordination. Refusal to Comply with Transfer Order and Failure to Recover Excess Payment Upheld as Willful Disobedience Under FCI Regulations. 2026-11-12 17:58:19
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation jurisdiction land acquisition burden of proof limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Against Tribunal's Order for Appointment of Exc...

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Enforcement Directorate Actions in Multiple Writ Petitions...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Civil Works Contract. The Court fou...

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employees in Public Service — Validity of...

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process in Forest Areas While Ensuring Compliance with Fore...

Lost Your Password?