Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hears Execution Appeals Against Order of State Commission in Consumer Complaint. Appeals Pertain to Execution Proceedings in CC/12/192 Before Maharashtra State Commission Regarding Consumer Dispute.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Admin
2026-08-09 03:04:32
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

APPEAL EXECUTION NO. 68 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 35

AE 68 of 2024 & AE 91 of 2024

2025-06-10

M/s. R. P. Builders, Rita Prabhudas Vithlani, Vatsal Prabhudas Vithlani, Mitsur Prabhudas Vithlani, Neha K. Katira, M/s. Aakash Builders and Developers

Mr. Jaiprakash Lalmuni Upadhyay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Execution proceeding arising from a consumer complaint

Remedy Sought

Appellants challenge order dated 21.05.2024 in execution applications EA/18/56 and EA/18/57

Previous Decisions

Order dated 21.05.2024 in EA/18/56 and EA/18/57 in CC/12/192 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra

Procedural History

The case originated as Consumer Complaint No. CC/12/192 before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra. Execution Applications EA/18/56 and EA/18/57 were filed, and by order dated 21.05.2024, the State Commission passed an order. Aggrieved, the appellants filed Appeal Execution Nos. 68 and 91 of 2024 before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
execution consumer protection appeal

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hears Execution Appeals Against Order of State Commission in Consumer Complaint. Appeals Pertain to Execution Proceedings in CC/12/192 Before Maharashtra State Commission Regarding Consumer Dispute. 2026-08-09 03:04:32
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Burial of Christian Father in Native Village Graveyard — Right to Dignified Burial Upheld Under Article 21. State Directed to Provide Police Protection Despite Opposition from Villagers. 2026-08-09 03:04:31
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder Compensation burden of proof Limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5184 OF 2026

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against School Tribunal's Denial of Reinstatement t...

Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. Objections...

Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones Delay Usin...

Supreme Court Upholds Defendant in Property Sale Deed Dispute; Non-Payment of Balance Cons...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining Performanc...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Sets Aside High Court Judgment for Non-Consideration of Addit...

Lost Your Password?