Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hears Execution Appeals Against Order of State Commission in Consumer Complaint. Appeals Pertain to Execution Proceedings in CC/12/192 Before Maharashtra State Commission Regarding Consumer Dispute.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Admin
2026-09-13 13:25:04
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

APPEAL EXECUTION NO. 68 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 35

AE 68 of 2024 & AE 91 of 2024

2025-06-10

M/s. R. P. Builders, Rita Prabhudas Vithlani, Vatsal Prabhudas Vithlani, Mitsur Prabhudas Vithlani, Neha K. Katira, M/s. Aakash Builders and Developers

Mr. Jaiprakash Lalmuni Upadhyay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Execution proceeding arising from a consumer complaint

Remedy Sought

Appellants challenge order dated 21.05.2024 in execution applications EA/18/56 and EA/18/57

Previous Decisions

Order dated 21.05.2024 in EA/18/56 and EA/18/57 in CC/12/192 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra

Procedural History

The case originated as Consumer Complaint No. CC/12/192 before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra. Execution Applications EA/18/56 and EA/18/57 were filed, and by order dated 21.05.2024, the State Commission passed an order. Aggrieved, the appellants filed Appeal Execution Nos. 68 and 91 of 2024 before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Acts & Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
execution consumer protection appeal

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Restoring Tenancy Declaration Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Landlords' Admission of Cultivation Constitutes Conclusive Proof of Tenancy. The court quashed the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order and restored the... 2026-09-24 20:44:55
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Union of India’s Challenge to Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Disability Pension Broad-Banding. Ex-Serviceman Entitled to Benefit Under Government Order of 18.04.2016 Following Supreme Court Decision in Ram Avtar. 2026-09-24 20:44:42
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions Against Discharge Order in Corruption...

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company Secretary in KOPD Act Case Due to ...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Restores Trial Proceedings in Forgery Case — High Court's Discharge Order ...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Limitation Dispute — Suit Remitted for Fresh Consider...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Murder Case Involving Minor Victims — Upholds Convict...

Lost Your Password?