Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 125
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Subhash s/o Zingaji Khade, who was charged with murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased, Domaji, had two sons, Punjab and Shrikrishna. Shrikrishna was married to Rajkanya, who was alleged to have illicit relations with the accused. Four to five days before the incident, Shrikrishna pretended to go to Katepurna for marketing but returned home and found Rajkanya missing. He sent his niece Chandralekha to find her, who discovered Rajkanya at the accused's house in a compromising position. The accused allegedly threatened Chandralekha not to disclose this. On the day of the incident, the deceased Domaji was found dead with injuries. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence: motive (illicit relations), last seen (the deceased was seen with the accused), extra-judicial confession (accused confessed to PW4), and dying declaration (deceased named the accused before dying). The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the evidence insufficient. The High Court upheld the acquittal, noting that the dying declaration was not reliable as it was not recorded by a Magistrate and the deceased was not in a fit state of mind. The extra-judicial confession was not proved beyond doubt as the witness did not disclose it promptly. The chain of circumstances was incomplete, and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen, extra-judicial confession, and dying declaration. The court held that the chain of circumstances was not complete and the evidence was not credible. The dying declaration was not reliable as it was not recorded by a Magistrate and the witnesses were interested. The extra-judicial confession was not proved beyond doubt. The appeal against acquittal was dismissed. (Paras 1-10)

B) Evidence Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability - Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - The dying declaration was made to a police officer and not recorded by a Magistrate. The court held that such a declaration must be scrutinized with caution. In this case, the dying declaration was not reliable as the deceased was not in a fit state of mind and the witnesses were interested. (Paras 6-8)

C) Criminal Law - Extra-Judicial Confession - Proof - The extra-judicial confession alleged to have been made by the accused to PW4 was not proved beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the witness did not disclose the confession to anyone for several days, which cast doubt on its veracity. (Para 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acquittal of the accused for the offence of murder under Section 302 IPC is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The acquittal of the respondent/accused is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • chain of circumstances must be complete
  • motive
  • last seen theory
  • extra-judicial confession
  • dying declaration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • acquittal appeal
  • interference with acquittal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (12) 112

Criminal Appeal No.250 of 1991

2006-12-04

K.J. Rohee, C.L. Pangarkar

A.D. Sonak (Addl. Public Prosecutor for appellant), V.A. Umre (Advocate for respondent)

State of Maharashtra

Subhash s/o Zingaji Khade

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal in a murder case.

Remedy Sought

The State sought conviction of the accused for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Filing Reason

The State appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola.

Previous Decisions

The accused was acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration is reliable? Whether the extra-judicial confession is proved? Whether the chain of circumstantial evidence is complete?

Submissions/Arguments

The prosecution argued that the dying declaration and extra-judicial confession proved the guilt. The defence argued that the evidence was unreliable and the acquittal was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be complete and must point only to the guilt of the accused. The dying declaration and extra-judicial confession were not reliable, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

The dying declaration is not reliable as it was not recorded by a Magistrate and the deceased was not in a fit state of mind. The extra-judicial confession was not proved beyond doubt as the witness did not disclose it promptly.

Procedural History

The accused was tried and acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola. The State appealed to the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Irrevocable Consents by Occupants Upheld. Court holds that once occupants have given unconditional irrevocable consents for redevelopment, they cannot subseq...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Maintenance for Wife and Daughters Under Domestic Violence Act Despite Prior Divorce Decree. Cohabitation After Divorce and Subsequent Second Marriage Constitute Domestic Violence Under Section 3 of the Protection of Women f...