Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Dying declaration recorded by Executive Magistrate found unreliable as deceased was under influence of medication and declarations were contradictory, leading to failure to prove offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 126
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Jubedabai and Ayyubshah (respondents/accused) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased Nasimbano was married to accused no.2 Ayyubshah seven years prior and lived with him and her mother-in-law, accused no.1 Jubedabai. The prosecution alleged that the accused ill-treated Nasimbano for money, leading her to file a complaint under Section 498-A, which was later withdrawn after assurances. On the day of the incident, Nasimbano was set on fire by the accused pouring kerosene, suffered 60% burns, and died. Her dying declaration was recorded by an Executive Magistrate, and she also made an oral dying declaration implicating accused no.1, while stating accused no.2 merely watched. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the dying declarations unreliable due to inconsistencies and the deceased being under medication. The High Court upheld the acquittal, noting that the dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated, and the prosecution failed to prove cruelty for dowry soon before death. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Evidence Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability - Dying declaration recorded by Executive Magistrate must be free from tutoring and made in a fit state of mind - The deceased was under the influence of medication and the declarations were contradictory, hence not reliable - Held that conviction cannot be based on such dying declarations without corroboration (Paras 5-10).

B) Criminal Law - Dowry Death - Section 304-B IPC - Ingredients - Demand of dowry and death within seven years of marriage - The prosecution failed to prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death - Held that the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act cannot be invoked (Paras 5-10).

C) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Circumstantial Evidence - The dying declarations being unreliable, there was no other evidence to prove that the accused set the deceased on fire - Held that the acquittal was justified (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declarations of the deceased were reliable and sufficient to convict the accused for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the order of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • reliability of dying declaration
  • corroboration of dying declaration
  • Section 304-B IPC
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (12) 111

Criminal Appeal No.232 of 1991

2006-12-04

K.J. Rohee, C.L. Pangarkar

Mr. D.B. Patel (Addl. Public Prosecutor for appellant/State), Mr. Anil Kumar Thakkar (Advocate for respondents/accused)

State of Maharashtra

Jubedabai w/o Shabbirshah and Ayyubshah s/o Shabbirshah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against acquittal in a criminal case involving dowry death and murder.

Remedy Sought

The State of Maharashtra sought conviction of the respondents for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Filing Reason

The State appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge, Akola acquitted the respondents of all charges.

Issues

Whether the dying declarations of the deceased were reliable and sufficient to convict the accused. Whether the prosecution proved the ingredients of dowry death under Section 304-B IPC. Whether the accused were guilty of murder under Section 302 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor argued that the dying declarations were reliable and should be believed. The learned counsel for the respondents argued that the dying declarations were contradictory and unreliable, and the acquittal was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration must be reliable and free from tutoring; contradictory declarations and the deceased being under medication render it unreliable. Without reliable dying declaration, conviction under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 IPC cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Sessions Judge, after consideration of the evidence, acquitted both the accused of the offences with which they were charged. We have heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the appellant/State and the learned counsel for the respondent-accused.

Procedural History

The case was initially tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, who acquitted the accused. The State of Maharashtra appealed to the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, which heard the appeal and dismissed it on 04/12/2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498-A, 304-B, 302, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Sets Aside Magistrate's Process Order in Matrimonial Offence Case Due to Lack of Judicial Application of Mind. Magistrate's Order Issuing Process Under Sections 498A, 406 read with Section 34 IPC Quashed as Mechanical, Matter Remanded for ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Dying declaration recorded by Executive Magistrate found unreliable as deceased was under influence of medication and declarations were contradictory, lea...