Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging Assistant Registrar's Order to Admit Transferee as Member. Society's refusal to admit transferee as member based on general undesirability without valid grounds held improper under Section 23 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 90
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, New Sion Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., was registered under the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 and deemed registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society owned a housing complex known as Sindhi Colony at Sion (West), Mumbai, consisting of about 279 row houses. Row House 10-B/6 belonged to Nanik Kishanchand Ahuja, Gopal Kishanchand Ahuja, and Sajan Kishanchand Ahuja, who were members of the society. The row house was in exclusive possession of a tenant, Mansukhlal Rachh, for about 40 years. The Fourth Respondent, Bhagatraj Gurmukhdas Ahuja, claimed to have an agreement to sell dated 21st January 1995 to purchase the row house. On 1st February 1995, a notice was given to the society indicating the intention to transfer shares and interest in the row house to the Fourth Respondent. The Managing Committee of the society passed a resolution on 13th February 1995 refusing the transfer on the ground that it was not desirable to admit the Fourth Respondent as a member in the larger interest of the society. A Special General Body Meeting on 5th March 1995 also decided unanimously not to admit the Fourth Respondent. The Fourth Respondent filed an appeal before the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society raised a preliminary issue regarding the jurisdiction of the Assistant Registrar, which was decided against the society. The Assistant Registrar allowed the appeal and directed the society to admit the Fourth Respondent as a member. The society challenged this order by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The High Court held that the Assistant Registrar had jurisdiction under Section 23(2) to entertain the appeal and that the society's refusal was not based on valid grounds as the society did not specify any particular reason for refusal. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the order of the Assistant Registrar.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Transfer of Shares and Membership - Section 23 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Refusal to Admit Transferee - The society refused to admit the transferee as a member on the ground that it was not desirable in the larger interest of the society. The Assistant Registrar allowed the appeal and directed the society to admit the transferee. The High Court held that the Assistant Registrar had jurisdiction under Section 23(2) to entertain the appeal and that the society's refusal was not based on valid grounds as the society did not specify any particular reason. The court upheld the order of the Assistant Registrar. (Paras 1-5)

B) Co-operative Law - Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar - Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Appeal Against Refusal of Membership - The society contended that the Assistant Registrar had no jurisdiction as the dispute was not between the society and a member. The High Court rejected this contention, holding that the appeal under Section 23(2) is a statutory remedy available to a person aggrieved by the refusal of a society to admit him as a member, and the Assistant Registrar has the power to decide such appeals. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Assistant Registrar under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the refusal of a co-operative housing society to admit a transferee as a member, and whether the society's refusal was valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of the Assistant Registrar directing the society to admit the fourth respondent as a member.

Law Points

  • Transfer of shares and membership in co-operative housing society
  • Refusal to admit transferee as member must be based on valid grounds
  • Section 23 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Appeal to Assistant Registrar under Section 23(2)
  • Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar to decide membership disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (10) 72

WRIT PETITION NO.111 OF 2002

2006-10-13

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.

Mr. C. J. Sawant, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. J. Thakkar for the Petitioner; Mr. Bhagatraj Gurmukhdas Ahuja, Respondent No.4-in-person

New Sion Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies directing the petitioner society to admit the fourth respondent as a member.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner society sought to quash the order of the Assistant Registrar and to uphold its refusal to admit the fourth respondent as a member.

Filing Reason

The society refused to admit the fourth respondent as a member after he sought transfer of shares and interest in a row house, and the Assistant Registrar allowed the fourth respondent's appeal against such refusal.

Previous Decisions

The Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies allowed the appeal of the fourth respondent under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, directing the society to admit him as a member.

Issues

Whether the Assistant Registrar under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the refusal of a co-operative housing society to admit a transferee as a member. Whether the society's refusal to admit the fourth respondent as a member was valid.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner society argued that the Assistant Registrar had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal as the dispute was not between the society and a member. The fourth respondent contended that the Assistant Registrar had jurisdiction under Section 23(2) and that the society's refusal was arbitrary and without valid grounds.

Ratio Decidendi

The Assistant Registrar under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the refusal of a co-operative society to admit a transferee as a member. The society's refusal must be based on valid grounds and not on a general statement of undesirability. In this case, the society did not specify any particular reason for refusal, and therefore the refusal was improper.

Judgment Excerpts

The Managing Committee of the Society passed a resolution on 13th February 1995 recording the refusal of the Society to the proposed transfer of interest in favour of the Fourth Respondent 'since in the larger interest of the Society and its members, it is not desirable to admit Mr.Bhagatraj Gurumukhdas Ahuja as a member of the Society.' The Fourth Respondent filed an appeal before the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies' Act, 1960.

Procedural History

The petitioner society refused to admit the fourth respondent as a member. The fourth respondent appealed to the Assistant Registrar under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Assistant Registrar allowed the appeal. The society filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the order. The High Court dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 23, 23(2)
  • Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Successive FIRs on Same Transaction Barred. Second FIR for Offences Under Section 409 IPC Read With Section 34 IPC Quashed as It Pertained to Same Incident as Earlier FIR, Viol...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging Assistant Registrar's Order to Admit Transferee as Member. Society's refusal to admit transferee as member based on general undesirability without valid grounds held imp...