Bombay High Court Grants Probation to Accused in Stabbing Case Due to Long Passage of Time and Nature of Injuries. Accused convicted under Sections 326 and 324 IPC for stabbing; court applied Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, releasing him on probation for two years.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 47
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Kaluram Nivrutti Tambe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.72 of 1987 for offences punishable under Sections 307 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He appealed to the Sessions Court, Pune, in Criminal Appeal No.330 of 1987, which reduced the sentence and altered the conviction from Sections 307 and 326 to Sections 326 and 324 IPC respectively. Aggrieved by this order, the applicant filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court. The prosecution case was that on 8th October 1986, the applicant stabbed the complainant Meghraj, and when the complainant's friend intervened, he also received a stab injury. The applicant was arrested and convicted. The legal issue was whether the applicant should be granted the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, given the nature of injuries and the long passage of time. The applicant's counsel argued that the offence under Section 326 was not made out based on the injury, and alternatively, that more than 20 years had passed, making it a fit case for probation. The court analyzed that the nature of injuries did not warrant a higher offence and that the long passage of time justified granting probation. The court held that the applicant should be released on probation for good conduct for a period of two years under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, and modified the sentence accordingly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Probation of Offenders Act - Section 4 - Benefit of Probation - Accused convicted under Sections 326 and 324 IPC for stabbing - Considering nature of injuries and that more than 20 years had elapsed since the incident, court held that it was a fit case to grant benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Accused released on probation for good conduct for a period of two years (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant should be granted the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering the nature of injuries and the long passage of time since the incident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the revision application in part, modifying the sentence. The applicant was released on probation for good conduct for a period of two years under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with a bond of Rs. 10,000/- and one surety of the like amount. The court directed that the applicant shall appear and receive sentence when called upon during the probation period.

Law Points

  • Probation of Offenders Act
  • 1958
  • Section 4
  • Section 326 IPC
  • Section 324 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • benefit of probation
  • nature of injury
  • long passage of time
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (10) 50

Criminal Revision Application No. 175 of 1996

2006-11-10

V.M. Kanade, J.

Mrs. Koparikar instructed by Mr. N.P. Deshpande for the Petitioner; Mr. U.V. Nikam, APP for the State

Kaluram Nivrutti Tambe

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application against conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 326 and 324 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought alteration of conviction and grant of benefit under Probation of Offenders Act.

Filing Reason

Applicant was convicted by Assistant Sessions Judge and his appeal was partly allowed by Sessions Court; he filed revision against the order.

Previous Decisions

Assistant Sessions Judge convicted applicant under Sections 307 and 326 IPC; Sessions Court altered conviction to Sections 326 and 324 IPC and reduced sentence.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 326 IPC was sustainable based on the nature of injury. Whether the applicant should be granted the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel argued that the injury did not attract Section 326 IPC and at most Section 324 IPC applied. Applicant's counsel submitted that more than 20 years had passed, making it a fit case for probation under the Probation of Offenders Act.

Ratio Decidendi

Considering the nature of injuries and the long passage of time (over 20 years), it is a fit case to grant the benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, instead of imposing a custodial sentence.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of injury which was found on the complainant, the offence under Section 326 was not made out and at the most, the applicant may be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the IPC. The learned Counsel further submitted that in otherwise, looking at the clear facts and circumstances of the case, this is a fit case where the applicant be granted the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act since more than 20 years have elapsed.

Procedural History

The applicant was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.72 of 1987 for offences under Sections 307 and 326 IPC. He appealed to the Sessions Court, Pune, in Criminal Appeal No.330 of 1987, which altered the conviction to Sections 326 and 324 IPC and reduced the sentence. Aggrieved, he filed Criminal Revision Application No.175 of 1996 before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307, 326, 324
  • Probation of Offenders Act, 1958: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Probation to Accused in Stabbing Case Due to Long Passage of Time and Nature of Injuries. Accused convicted under Sections 326 and 324 IPC for stabbing; court applied Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, releasing h...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Cruelty Under Section 498-A IPC — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone Due to Compromise and Long Pendency. The court maintained the conviction under Section 498-A IPC but reduced the sent...