Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Granting Permission to Start 1495 New Schools in Breach of Mandatory Norms. Power to grant permission to start new schools is vested in the State Government under the Secondary School Code and must be exercised in accordance with the mandatory directions laid down by the High Court in Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 50
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Maharashtra Rajya Shikshan Sanstha Mahamandal, a registered association of managements of recognized schools in Maharashtra, challenged an order dated 16.05.2006 passed by Respondent No.3, the Minister of School Education, granting permission to start 1495 new primary, secondary and higher secondary schools in the State from academic session 2006-2007. The petitioner contended that the power to grant such permission is vested in the State Government under the Secondary School Code, and that the High Court in Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra, 2001(1) Mh.L.J. 776 had issued mandatory directions to be followed by the State Government while granting permission to start new schools. The petitioner argued that the impugned order was in total breach of these mandatory norms and therefore unsustainable. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the impugned order was indeed in breach of the mandatory directions laid down in the Gramvikas case. The court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 16.05.2006 and directed the State Government to consider the matter afresh in accordance with law and the mandatory directions issued by the court. The rule was made absolute accordingly.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Grant of Permission to Start New Schools - Mandatory Directions - The power to grant permission to start new primary, secondary or higher secondary schools is vested in the State Government under the Secondary School Code. The High Court in Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra, 2001(1) Mh.L.J. 776 issued mandatory directions to be followed by the State Government while granting such permission. The impugned order dated 16.05.2006 passed by Respondent No.3 granting permission to start 1495 new schools was in total breach of these mandatory norms and therefore unsustainable in law. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 16.05.2006 passed by Respondent No.3 granting permission to start 1495 new primary, secondary and higher secondary schools in the State of Maharashtra from academic session 2006-2007 is in breach of mandatory norms and liable to be quashed and set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 16.05.2006 passed by Respondent No.3 is quashed and set aside. The State Government is directed to consider the matter afresh in accordance with law and the mandatory directions issued by this Court in Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Mandatory directions of the High Court must be followed by the State Government while granting permission to start new schools
  • Power to grant permission to start new schools is vested in the State Government under the Secondary School Code
  • Minister's order granting permission in breach of mandatory norms is unsustainable in law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (07) 119

Writ Petition No.2897 of 2006

2006-07-07

D.D. Sinha, R.C. Chavan

Shri B.G. Kulkarni for Petitioner, Shri A.B. Choudhari for Respondent Nos.1 & 2, Shri V.R. Manohar for Respondent No.3

Maharashtra Rajya Shikshan Sanstha Mahamandal

State of Maharashtra, Director of School Education, Shri Vasant Purke

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Minister of School Education granting permission to start 1495 new schools.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned order dated 16.05.2006 and direction to the State Government to consider the matter afresh in accordance with law.

Filing Reason

The impugned order was passed in breach of mandatory norms laid down by the High Court in Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra.

Previous Decisions

The High Court in Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra, 2001(1) Mh.L.J. 776 issued mandatory directions to be followed by the State Government while granting permission to start new schools.

Issues

Whether the impugned order granting permission to start 1495 new schools is in breach of mandatory norms and liable to be quashed.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner contended that the power to grant permission is vested in the State Government under the Secondary School Code and the impugned order is in total breach of mandatory directions issued by this Court in Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. State of Maharashtra.

Ratio Decidendi

The power to grant permission to start new schools is vested in the State Government under the Secondary School Code and must be exercised in accordance with the mandatory directions laid down by the High Court. Any order passed in breach of such mandatory norms is unsustainable in law.

Judgment Excerpts

This Court by its judgment in the case of Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Vs. State of Maharashtra & others, reported in 2001(1) Mh.L.J. 776 issued mandatory directions to be followed by the State Government while granting permission to start new schools. It is contended that respondent No.3 vide impugned order dated 16.05.2006 granted permission to start 1495 new primary, secondary and higher secondary schools in the State of Maharashtra from academic session 2006-2007 in total breach of mandatory norms and therefore, the impugned order, is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.2897 of 2006 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the order dated 16.05.2006 passed by Respondent No.3. The court heard the parties and delivered judgment on 07.07.2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Secondary School Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Granting Permission to Start 1495 New Schools in Breach of Mandatory Norms. Power to grant permission to start new schools is vested in the State Government under the Secondary School Code and must be exerci...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Served After 18 Years, No Acquisition Within 24 Months, Reservation Deemed Lapsed. The court held that the Director of Town Planning correctly dec...