Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Muslim Divorce Case — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Dahej Recovery Under Muslim Women Act. Section 3 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 provides exclusive remedy before Magistrate for return of property given at or before marriage.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (applicants) against an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Daryapur dated 1.12.1999, which dismissed their application under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking dismissal of the suit for want of jurisdiction. The non-applicant (original plaintiff) is a Muslim divorced woman who filed Regular Civil Suit No. 36/1998 for return of articles of Dahej (dowry) against the applicants, who are her former husband and his relatives. The applicants contended that the marriage between applicant no.1 and the non-applicant was dissolved by divorce on 17.8.1998. They argued that under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, a Muslim divorced woman is entitled to apply before a Magistrate for recovery of property given to her before, at the time of, or after marriage, and the Magistrate has the power to make orders for delivery of such properties. Therefore, the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The trial court rejected this application, leading to the revision. The High Court, after hearing the applicants' counsel (the non-applicant was served but did not appear), examined the provisions of Section 3 of the 1986 Act. It noted that sub-section (2) of Section 3 allows a divorced woman to apply to a Magistrate for recovery of property, and sub-section (4) empowers the Magistrate to enforce compliance. The court held that the remedy under the 1986 Act is exclusive and bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Court. Consequently, the High Court allowed the revision application, set aside the trial court's order, and dismissed the suit as not maintainable. The court directed that the non-applicant may approach the appropriate Magistrate under Section 3 of the 1986 Act for the relief sought.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Bar under Special Statute - Section 9 CPC, Section 3 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - The suit for return of dahej articles filed by a Muslim divorced woman before Civil Court is not maintainable as Section 3 of the 1986 Act provides an exclusive remedy before the Magistrate for recovery of property given at or before marriage - Held that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction and the suit must be dismissed (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit for return of articles of Dahej filed by a Muslim divorced woman, in view of the provisions of Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The civil revision application is allowed. The impugned order dated 1.12.1999 is set aside. The Regular Civil Suit No. 36/1998 is dismissed as not maintainable. The non-applicant is at liberty to approach the appropriate Magistrate under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 for the relief sought.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Civil Court barred under Section 3 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act
  • 1986
  • Exclusive remedy before Magistrate for recovery of dahej
  • Section 9 CPC cannot confer jurisdiction where statute provides special forum
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (03) 105

Civil Revision Application No. 333 of 2000

2006-03-27

D.D. Sinha

Shri C.S. Kaptan for applicants; Non-applicant served but none appeared

Amirshah s/o Kadirshah and others

Salimabi w/o Amirsha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision application against order dismissing application under Section 9 CPC for dismissal of suit for want of jurisdiction.

Remedy Sought

Applicants (original defendants) sought dismissal of the suit for return of dahej articles on the ground that Civil Court lacks jurisdiction.

Filing Reason

Non-applicant (original plaintiff) filed Regular Civil Suit No. 36/1998 for return of articles of Dahej after divorce.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court dismissed the application under Section 9 CPC vide order dated 1.12.1999.

Issues

Whether the Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit for return of dahej articles filed by a Muslim divorced woman in view of Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that under Section 3 of the 1986 Act, a Muslim divorced woman can only apply before a Magistrate for recovery of property given at or before marriage, and the Civil Court has no jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The remedy under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 is exclusive and bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to entertain a suit for return of dahej articles by a Muslim divorced woman.

Judgment Excerpts

sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Act of 1986 contemplates that a Muslim divorced woman shall be entitled to make an application before the Magistrate for recovery of property given to her before or at the time of marriage or after her marriage... the remedy under Section 3 of the Act of 1986 is exclusive and bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Court.

Procedural History

Non-applicant filed Regular Civil Suit No. 36/1998 before Civil Judge, Senior Division, Daryapur for return of dahej articles. Applicants filed application under Section 9 CPC for dismissal of suit for want of jurisdiction. Trial Court dismissed the application on 1.12.1999. Applicants filed Civil Revision Application No. 333 of 2000 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. High Court allowed revision on 27.3.2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 9
  • Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment on Poramboke Land as Encroachment Already Removed. The court held that the petition became infructuous as the relief sought was already complied with by the respondents.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Persons with Benchmark Disabilities in Auditor Posts Under RPwD Act, 2016. The court held that candidates with specific learning disability and mental illness are entitled to appointment in Group C posts identifie...