Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Personal Expenses and Application of Multiplier. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in not deducting personal expenses of the deceased and in applying multiplier of 16 instead of 15 based on age of deceased.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 74
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and three minor children of Gopal Krishnan, a rickshaw driver who died in a collision with a jeep on March 14, 1984. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,50,000 as compensation. The insurer appealed, challenging the computation. The High Court found that the Tribunal had not deducted any amount towards personal expenses of the deceased, which was erroneous as the deceased was a married man with dependents. Applying the principle that 1/4th should be deducted for personal expenses, the court recalculated the loss of dependency. Further, the Tribunal had applied a multiplier of 16, but the correct multiplier for a person aged 40-45 years as per the Second Schedule is 15. The court recalculated the compensation: monthly income Rs. 600, annual income Rs. 7,200, less 1/4th personal expenses = Rs. 5,400, multiplied by 15 = Rs. 81,000. Adding Rs. 2,000 for funeral expenses and Rs. 5,000 for loss of consortium, total compensation was fixed at Rs. 88,000. The appeal was partly allowed, reducing the award from Rs. 1,50,000 to Rs. 88,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of application.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Deduction of Personal Expenses - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Tribunal erred in not deducting any amount towards personal expenses of the deceased who was a married man with four dependents - Held that deduction of 1/4th towards personal expenses is appropriate as per settled law (Paras 4-5).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Multiplier - Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Tribunal applied multiplier of 16 based on age of deceased (40 years) - Held that as per Second Schedule to Motor Vehicles Act, multiplier for age 40-45 is 15, not 16 - Compensation recalculated accordingly (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal correctly computed compensation by not deducting personal expenses of the deceased and by applying multiplier of 16 instead of 15.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation reduced from Rs. 1,50,000 to Rs. 88,000 with interest at 6% per annum from date of application till realization.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Compensation Calculation
  • Deduction of Personal Expenses
  • Multiplier Application
  • Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (04) 37

First Appeal No. 743 of 1992

2006-04-10

K.J. Rohee, J.

Shri J.S. Chandani for appellant, Mrs. S.V. Sonawane for respondents

National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Smt. Bhargavi Gopala Krishnan & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Reduction of compensation awarded by Tribunal

Filing Reason

Insurer challenged the quantum of compensation awarded to dependents of deceased

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,50,000 on 28th August, 1991

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in not deducting personal expenses of the deceased? Whether the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier of 16 instead of 15?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that no deduction for personal expenses was made and multiplier should be 15 as per Second Schedule. Respondents supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims, for a married deceased with dependents, 1/4th of income must be deducted for personal expenses. Multiplier should be as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act based on age of deceased.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has not deducted any amount towards personal expenses of the deceased. The multiplier of 16 applied by the Tribunal is not correct. The correct multiplier is 15.

Procedural History

Application No. 1992/1984 filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Greater Bombay, awarded compensation on 28th August, 1991. Insurer appealed to High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit — Amendment Sought to Introduce New Case After Evidence Closed, Held Not Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Deduction of Personal Expenses and Application of Multiplier. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in not deducting personal expenses of the...