Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Modifies Interest Rate on Refund of Earnest Money. Court holds that in absence of pleading and evidence of commercial transaction, interest under Section 34 CPC at 6% per annum from date of suit is appropriate, not from date of agreement.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The respondent (original plaintiff) filed a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of property, or in the alternative, for refund of earnest money of Rs. one lakh with interest at 18% per annum. The trial court partly decreed the suit, refusing specific performance but granting refund of Rs. one lakh with interest at 18% per annum from the date of agreement (12.3.2004) till realisation. The appellant (original defendant) appealed, and the first appellate court reduced the interest rate to 12% per annum from the same date. Dissatisfied, the appellant filed a second appeal. The High Court admitted the appeal on a substantial question of law regarding the award of interest from the date of transaction. During hearing, an additional substantial question was framed: whether the first appellate court was right in awarding interest at 12% per annum in the absence of pleading and evidence of a commercial transaction. The appellant argued that there was no pleading or evidence that the transaction was commercial or that the parties agreed to interest at a commercial rate. The respondent did not appear. The High Court held that in the absence of any pleading or evidence that the transaction was commercial or that there was an agreement to pay interest from the date of transaction, the courts below erred in awarding interest from the date of agreement. The court noted that the suit was for specific performance, which is not a commercial transaction per se. Applying Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the court held that interest can only be awarded from the date of suit at the rate of 6% per annum. Accordingly, the High Court modified the decree, directing refund of Rs. one lakh with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit (date of filing of Special Civil Suit No. 22 of 2007) till realisation. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interest - Section 34 CPC - Award of interest from date of transaction - In a suit for specific performance or refund of earnest money, interest cannot be awarded from the date of transaction unless there is pleading and evidence that the transaction was commercial or that the parties agreed to such interest. The court held that in the absence of such pleading and evidence, interest under Section 34 CPC can only be awarded from the date of suit at the rate of 6% per annum. (Paras 6-9)

B) Contract Law - Specific Performance - Earnest Money - Refund with Interest - Where the agreement does not stipulate interest on refund of earnest money and the transaction is not commercial, the court cannot award interest from the date of agreement. The proper course is to award interest under Section 34 CPC from the date of suit at the rate of 6% per annum. (Paras 7-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the courts below were right in awarding interest from the date of transaction (12.3.2004) on the principal sum of Rs. one lakh, and whether the first appellate court was right in awarding interest at 12% per annum in the absence of any pleading and evidence that it was a commercial transaction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The judgment and decree of the first appellate court are modified. The appellant shall pay to the respondent Rs. one lakh with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit (date of filing of Special Civil Suit No. 22 of 2007) till realisation. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interest from date of transaction not permissible without pleading and evidence of commercial transaction
  • Interest under Section 34 CPC from date of suit at 6% per annum
  • No agreement for interest rate in absence of commercial transaction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (11) 71

Second Appeal No. 583 of 2012

2013-11-29

S.B. Shukre, J.

Mr. A. Shelat for the Appellant; None for the Respondent

Abhinav s/o Gopal Agrawal

Pradeep s/o Parasram Thakre

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against judgment and decree in a suit for specific performance of contract or alternative refund of earnest money.

Remedy Sought

Appellant (original defendant) sought to challenge the award of interest from the date of transaction and the rate of interest.

Filing Reason

Appellant was dissatisfied with the first appellate court's judgment directing payment of Rs. one lakh with interest at 12% per annum from 12.3.2004.

Previous Decisions

Trial court decreed refund of Rs. one lakh with interest at 18% per annum from 12.3.2004; first appellate court reduced interest to 12% per annum from same date.

Issues

Whether the courts below were right in awarding interest from the date of transaction (12.3.2004) on the principal sum of Rs. one lakh? Whether the first appellate court was right in awarding interest at 12% per annum in the absence of any pleading and evidence that it was a commercial transaction?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant submitted that there was no pleading or evidence that the suit transaction was commercial or that the parties agreed to interest at a commercial rate. Respondent did not appear despite service.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of pleading and evidence that the transaction was commercial or that the parties agreed to interest from the date of transaction, interest under Section 34 CPC can only be awarded from the date of suit at the rate of 6% per annum.

Judgment Excerpts

In the absence of any pleading and evidence that the suit transaction was commercial or that the parties had agreed to pay interest at a particular rate from the date of transaction, the courts below were not right in awarding interest from the date of transaction. The proper course would be to award interest under Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure from the date of suit at the rate of 6% per annum.

Procedural History

Respondent filed Special Civil Suit No. 22 of 2007 for specific performance or refund of earnest money. Trial court partly decreed on 30.1.2010 granting refund with interest at 18% from 12.3.2004. Appellant appealed to District Court in Regular Civil Appeal No. 29 of 2010, which partly allowed on 16.8.2012 reducing interest to 12% from same date. Appellant then filed Second Appeal No. 583 of 2012 in Bombay High Court, which was admitted on 11.12.2012 on substantial question of law. Additional substantial question framed on 29.11.2013. Final hearing on 29.11.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Suspension of Sentence and Bail in Dowry Death Case Pending Appeal. Appellant convicted under Sections 304B and 498A IPC granted bail considering period of incarceration and pendency of appeal.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Erroneous Finding on Negligence — Claimant Injured by S.T. Bus While Standing on Platform. The Tribunal's dismissal of the claim petition was set aside as it drew unwar...