Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Directing Inspection for Seat Enhancement in PG Medical Courses. MCI's Recommendation to Bar Admissions for Five Years Was Not Accepted by Union of India, But High Court Erred in Directing Inspection Without Considering Pending Writ Petition in Delhi High Court.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court set aside an interim order of the Rajasthan High Court that directed the Medical Council of India (MCI) to conduct an inspection for enhancement of seats in M.S. (Orthopedics) and M.D. (Radio Diagnosis) at the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur. The Respondent-Institute had been granted permission to start these PG courses in 2011, but after inspections, MCI found deficiencies and recommended barring admissions for five years from 2017. The Union of India issued a notification in June 2017 recognizing qualifications for students admitted in 2011-2014, but a corrigendum in April 2018 limited recognition to those three academic years only. The Institute filed a writ petition in Delhi High Court challenging the corrigendum, which was pending. Subsequently, the Institute filed another writ petition in Rajasthan High Court seeking inspection for seat enhancement for 2019-2020. The Rajasthan High Court, noting the urgency due to the February 28 deadline, directed MCI to conduct inspection and submit a report. The Supreme Court held that the Institute was guilty of forum shopping by approaching a different High Court while the earlier petition was pending. The Court set aside the interim order and directed the Rajasthan High Court to dispose of the writ petition in light of the observations, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Forum Shopping - Interim Orders - The High Court of Rajasthan erred in passing an interim order directing inspection for seat enhancement when a similar writ petition was pending before the Delhi High Court, amounting to forum shopping. (Paras 5-9)

B) Medical Law - Recognition of Medical Qualifications - Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Section 11(2) - Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, Regulations 6(2) and (3) - The MCI's recommendation to bar admissions for five years was not accepted by the Union of India, but the High Court's direction to conduct inspection was set aside due to pending proceedings. (Paras 2-4, 9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court of Rajasthan was justified in directing the Medical Council of India to conduct an inspection for enhancement of seats in M.S. (Orthopedics) and M.D. (Radio Diagnosis) courses at the Respondent-Institute, pending a similar writ petition before the Delhi High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the interim order of the Rajasthan High Court dated 21.02.2019, and directed the High Court to dispose of the writ petition in accordance with law, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

Law Points

  • Forum shopping
  • Interim orders
  • Medical Council of India
  • Recognition of medical qualifications
  • Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations
  • 2000
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (4) 37

Civil Appeal No.3340 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.5964 of 2019)

2019-03-01

L. Nageswara Rao

Vikas Singh (for appellant), Niraj Kishan Kaul and Ranjit Kumar (for respondent)

Board of Governors in Supersession of Medical Council of India

National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against an interim order of the Rajasthan High Court directing inspection for enhancement of seats in PG medical courses.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (MCI) sought to set aside the High Court's interim order directing inspection.

Filing Reason

The appellant was aggrieved by the direction to conduct inspection for seat enhancement, arguing that the respondent had indulged in forum shopping.

Previous Decisions

The Rajasthan High Court had directed inspection on 21.02.2019. Earlier, the Delhi High Court had issued notice but refused interim relief in a related writ petition.

Issues

Whether the Rajasthan High Court was justified in directing inspection when a similar writ petition was pending before the Delhi High Court. Whether the MCI's recommendation to bar admissions for five years was accepted by the Union of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant: The respondent indulged in forum shopping; the recommendation to bar admissions was final; the High Court erred in directing inspection without surprise element. Respondent: No shortage of facilities; the recommendation was not accepted by Union of India; the application for enhancement was pending; no bar on filing in Rajasthan High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

A party cannot be permitted to file a fresh writ petition in a different High Court when a similar petition is already pending before another High Court, as it amounts to forum shopping. The High Court should have considered the pendency of the earlier writ petition before passing any interim order.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court was not right in holding that the recommendations made by the Appellant were not accepted by the Second Respondent. The First Respondent had indulged in forum shopping by approaching the Rajasthan High Court as the earlier Writ Petitions were filed by the First Respondent in the Delhi High Court.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a writ petition in Delhi High Court challenging the corrigendum dated 09.04.2018, which was pending. Subsequently, the respondent filed another writ petition in Rajasthan High Court seeking inspection for seat enhancement. The Rajasthan High Court passed an interim order on 21.02.2019 directing inspection. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Medical Council Act, 1956: Section 11(2), Section 20
  • Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000: Regulations 6(2), 6(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Directing Inspection for Seat Enhancement in PG Medical Courses. MCI's Recommendation to Bar Admissions for Five Years Was Not Accepted by Union of India, But High Court Erred in Directing Inspection Without ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a fo...