Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Workmen's Compensation Award for Loss of Vision. Employer's Liability for Workplace Injury Upheld Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 90
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against an award dated 2/9/2009 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation in Application (WCA No. 48/C/19/2007). The respondent workman, Mr. Sharif Basheer Shaikh, was employed by M/s. Enterprising Enterprise Engineer and Contract at Borivali, Mumbai, and was engaged to break old track at the Dry Dock (Indira Dock) of Mumbai Port Trust on 11/11/2005. During the course of his employment, an iron piece from a chisel entered his left eye, causing serious injury. He was taken to St. George Hospital and later to Harkisondas Nurottamdas Hospital on 5/12/2006, where an operation was performed on 6/12/2006 to remove the iron piece. However, he lost vision in his left eye and began suffering from frequent fits and bleeding while sneezing. He could not perform any work thereafter. The workman claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, contending that he was engaged at monthly wages of Rs.4500/- and was aged 40 years at the time of the accident. The Commissioner awarded compensation of Rs.3,60,000/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the accident until realization. The insurance company appealed, challenging the award. The court heard submissions from both sides. The court held that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment, resulting in permanent total disablement. The court found no infirmity in the Commissioner's order and dismissed the appeal, confirming the award. The court also directed that the amount deposited by the appellant be paid to the respondents along with accrued interest.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Employer's Liability - Section 3, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Injury arising out of and in the course of employment - Workman sustained injury when an iron piece from a chisel entered his left eye while breaking old track at worksite - Held that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment, making employer liable (Paras 4-5).

B) Workmen's Compensation - Permanent Total Disablement - Section 4(1)(b), Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Loss of vision in one eye - Workman lost vision in left eye and suffered frequent fits - Held that the injury resulted in permanent total disablement as the workman could not perform any work (Paras 4-5).

C) Workmen's Compensation - Computation of Compensation - Section 4, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Monthly wages of Rs.4500/- and age 40 years - Commissioner awarded Rs.3,60,000/- with interest - Held that the computation was correct as per Schedule IV (Paras 5-6).

D) Workmen's Compensation - Insurance Company's Liability - Section 3, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Insurance policy covering employer's liability - The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. was the insurer - Held that the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation awarded (Paras 1, 6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation correctly awarded compensation for loss of vision due to workplace injury and whether the insurance company is liable to pay the same.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The judgment and award dated 2/9/2009 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation is confirmed. The amount deposited by the appellant shall be paid to the respondents along with accrued interest.

Law Points

  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
  • Section 3
  • Section 4
  • Section 10
  • Section 30
  • Employer's liability
  • Insurance company's liability
  • Loss of vision
  • Permanent total disablement
  • Computation of compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (10) 114

First Appeal No. 1324 of 2013 with Civil Application No. 352 of 2010

2013-10-10

A. P. Bhangale

Ms. Poonam Mital for the appellant, Mr. V. M. Parkar for the respondents

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

1. Mr. Sharif Basheer Shaikh (Expired), 2. Smt. Shabana Begum Sharif Shaikh, 3. Master Asim Sharif Shaikh, 4. Master Salman Sharif Shaikh, 5. Master Samir Sharif Shaikh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought to set aside the award of compensation

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the award of Rs.3,60,000/- with interest passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation

Previous Decisions

Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarded compensation of Rs.3,60,000/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of accident until realization

Issues

Whether the injury arose out of and in the course of employment? Whether the workman suffered permanent total disablement? Whether the compensation awarded is correct? Whether the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant insurance company argued against the award. Respondents supported the award.

Ratio Decidendi

The injury arose out of and in the course of employment, resulting in permanent total disablement. The Commissioner correctly computed compensation under Section 4 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The insurance company is liable to pay the compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard submissions at the bar. This appeal was directed to be heard finally after its registration pursuant to the order passed by this court dated 12/9/2013. It appears that the judgment and award dated 2/9/2009 passed by learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation in Application (WCA No. 48/C/19/2007) is under challenge.

Procedural History

The workman filed an application for compensation before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, which was allowed on 2/9/2009. The insurance company filed an appeal before the High Court on 12/9/2013, which was heard and dismissed on 10/10/2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 3, Section 4, Section 10, Section 30
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Property Dispute Between Member and Housing Society. Member's claim for plot allotment fails as cancellation by NIT and subsequent sale to third party upheld due to member's...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Promotions in Municipal Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi and Delay. Petitioners, who were not eligible for promotion to Junior Engineer, cannot challenge promotions of others, and the challenge...