Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. held not liable for entire compensation as deceased was negligent in driving his motorcycle without helmet and license, contributing to the accident.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by New India Assurance Company Ltd. challenging the judgment and order dated 20/6/2001 in Claim Petition No. 37/1993 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur. The Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs. 96,000/- to the claimants (respondents no. 1 to 3) for the death of Narayanrao Wanode in a motor vehicle accident. The accident occurred when the deceased, while driving a motorcycle, dashed against a stationary bus owned by Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. The Tribunal held the appellant insurance company and other respondents jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation. The appellant contended that the deceased was negligent as he was driving without a helmet and without a valid driving license, and that the accident was solely due to his negligence. The court examined the evidence and found that the deceased was indeed negligent and contributed to the accident. The court held that the insurance company's liability should be reduced to 50% of the awarded amount, and the remaining 50% shall be paid by the other respondents. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award accordingly.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Compensation - Contributory Negligence - Deceased Motorcyclist - The deceased was driving a motorcycle without a helmet and without a valid driving license, and dashed against a stationary bus. The court held that the deceased was negligent and contributed to the accident. The insurance company's liability was reduced to 50% of the awarded amount. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Accident Compensation - Joint and Several Liability - Insurance Company - The Tribunal had held the appellant and other respondents jointly and severally liable. The High Court modified the award, holding that the insurance company is liable only to the extent of 50% due to contributory negligence of the deceased. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in holding the appellant insurance company jointly and severally liable for the entire compensation despite contributory negligence of the deceased?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The award of Rs. 96,000/- is modified. The appellant insurance company is liable to pay 50% of the awarded amount, and the remaining 50% shall be paid by the other respondents jointly and severally.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Joint and several liability
  • Insurance company liability
  • Negligence of deceased
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (08) 169

First Appeal No. 396 of 2008

2013-08-21

A. P. Bhangale, J.

Mr. A.J.Pophaly for Appellant, Mr. N.A.Padhye for Respondents No.1 to 3

New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Vishwanath s/o Narayanrao Wanode, Smt. Satyabhama w/o Vishwanath Wanode, Manohar s/o Vishwanath Wanode, Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Jaggasingh s/o Bhairaosingh @ Sarabsingh Thakur, Sheikh Hasan Ali s/o Sheikh Ahmed, Dilip s/o Deoraoji Dhawale, Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim petition.

Remedy Sought

Appellant insurance company sought reduction of liability on ground of contributory negligence of deceased.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the Tribunal's order holding it jointly and severally liable for entire compensation.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur awarded Rs. 96,000/- in Claim Petition No. 37/1993 dated 20/6/2001.

Issues

Whether the deceased was negligent and contributed to the accident? Whether the insurance company's liability should be reduced due to contributory negligence?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the deceased was driving without helmet and without valid driving license, and dashed against a stationary bus, thus solely negligent. Respondents argued that the accident was due to negligence of the bus driver and other respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The deceased was negligent in driving his motorcycle without a helmet and without a valid driving license, and dashed against a stationary bus. Therefore, he contributed to the accident. The insurance company's liability is reduced to 50% due to contributory negligence.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is to challenge Judgment and Order in Claim Petition No. 37/1993 dated 20/6/2001 decided by learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur. The court held that the deceased was negligent and contributed to the accident.

Procedural History

Claim Petition No. 37/1993 was filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which awarded compensation of Rs. 96,000/- on 20/6/2001. The appellant filed First Appeal No. 396/2008 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was decided on 21/8/2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Time to File Reply in PIL Against State of Maharashtra. Court Allows One Week for State's Reply and Amicus Curiae's Report, Lists Matter for January 19, 2005.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration in Domestic Dispute Case. Husband convicted under Section 302 IPC for setting wife on fire after argument over money for medicine.