Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Evidence Shows No Intention to Cause Death, Only Simple Injuries.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 171
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Smt. Nayana Chandrakant Kamble, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of her husband and sentenced to life imprisonment. She appealed against this conviction. The prosecution case was that on 28 September 2008, the appellant and her husband had a quarrel in their servant's quarter, and later the appellant was found with bloodstained hands and legs. The husband was found dead with injuries. The appellant claimed that her husband might have fallen in a drunken state. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of the complainant Lt. Vishal Sharma and the medical evidence of PW9 Dr. Murkey, who found 12 CLW injuries on the deceased, but none on vital parts. The court noted that the injuries were simple and caused by a blunt object, and there was no evidence of intention to cause death. The court also considered that the appellant had no motive and the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel. The court held that the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, which covers culpable homicide not amounting to murder when committed without premeditation in a sudden fight. Accordingly, the court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC, sentencing her to the period already undergone (about 3 years and 5 months). The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction set aside - Appellant convicted for murder of her husband - Evidence showed quarrel and injuries but no intention to cause death - Injuries were simple and not on vital parts - Court held that the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC - Appellant acquitted under Section 302 and convicted under Section 304 Part II, sentenced to period already undergone (Paras 1-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder of her husband is sustainable in law, or whether the offence falls under a lesser culpable homicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to the period already undergone (about 3 years and 5 months). Fine of Rs.3,000/- set aside. Appellant to be released forthwith if not required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder
  • Intention to cause death
  • Knowledge of likely death
  • Benefit of doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (08) 83

Criminal Appeal No.181 of 2010

2013-08-07

Mrs. V.K. Tahilramani, Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar

Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam for the Appellant, Mrs. S.V. Gajare – Dhumal, APP, for Respondent – State

Smt. Nayana Chandrakant Kamble

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of her husband

Previous Decisions

Sessions Court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable Whether the offence falls under a lesser culpable homicide

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that there was no intention to cause death and injuries were simple State argued that the appellant caused the death of her husband

Ratio Decidendi

The injuries were simple and not on vital parts, there was no intention to cause death, and the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, thus the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The injuries were simple in nature and none of the injuries were on the vital parts of the body. The case would fall under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC and hence the offence would be culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai on 24.2.2010 in Sessions Case No.67 of 2009 under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. She appealed to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304 Part II, 300 Exception 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case — Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Security Deposit Refund. Cheques Issued for Refund of Security Deposit Under Lease Agreement Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt; C...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Bombay High Court Order Setting Aside Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A NI Act. Signatory of Cheque Authorized by Company is 'Drawer' Liable for Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A of Negotiable Instru...