Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Peon in Private School for Lack of Enquiry under MEPS Rules. Termination Order Passed Without Granting Opportunity to Employee and Without Conducting Enquiry as Required Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 Held Unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the termination of a peon employed in a private school managed by Shetkari Shikshan Sanstha. The petitioner, Devidas s/o Dashrath Wirutkar, was terminated by an order dated 24.04.1997 issued by the school management. The termination order mentioned misconduct but did not disclose that any enquiry had been held prior to the termination. The petitioner challenged the termination by filing a writ petition before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, contending that the termination was in violation of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981, which mandate an enquiry before imposing any major penalty. The management in its reply asserted that the petitioner had admitted guilt, but the petitioner denied the contents of the termination order and any such admission. The court noted that the termination order inflicted a major penalty without affording any opportunity to the petitioner and without holding an enquiry. The court further observed that the petition had been admitted in 1997 and an ad interim stay had been granted, which continued undisturbed for over sixteen years, as the management neither challenged the interim order nor pressed for early disposal. In such circumstances, the court held that the termination order was unsustainable for want of procedural fairness and non-compliance with the service rules. It declined to relegate the petitioner to an alternative remedy, given the long pendency and the unchallenged interim protection. Accordingly, the writ petition was allowed, the termination order was quashed, and the respondents were directed to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner in accordance with law. The parties were also given liberty to settle the matter.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination - Enquiry under MEPS Rules - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - The petitioner was terminated for misconduct without an enquiry as required under the Rules; the order mentioned misconduct but no opportunity was given; the management alleged admission of guilt; Held: termination order is unsustainable as it inflicted major penalty without giving any opportunity and no enquiry was conducted (Paras 1-2)

B) Service Law - Termination - Admission of Guilt - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - The management relied on letters about alleged admission of guilt by the petitioner; Held: mere alleged admission without proper enquiry does not justify termination, especially when petitioner denies contents; major penalty cannot be based solely on alleged admission without providing opportunity to be heard (Paras 1-2)

C) Civil Procedure - Writ Jurisdiction - Alternative Remedy - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - The court refused to relegate the petitioner to alternative remedy because the petition was admitted and pending since 1997, interim order had not been challenged, and the matter was repeatedly adjourned; Held: in such circumstances, it is not appropriate to direct the petitioner to avail alternative remedy (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether termination order passed by school management without holding an enquiry under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 is valid? Whether the High Court should entertain the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy given the factual circumstances?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed; termination order dated 24.04.1997 quashed and set aside; respondents directed to grant all benefits to petitioner in accordance with law; liberty to parties to settle the matter; no costs.

Law Points

  • Termination for misconduct without conducting an enquiry under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules
  • 1981 is unsustainable
  • Inflicting major penalty without giving opportunity violates principles of natural justice
  • Where interim relief remains unchallenged and petition pending for long
  • court may grant relief despite alternative remedy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (07) 205

WRIT PETITION NO. 1183 OF 1997

2013-07-01

Anoop V. Mohta, Z.A. Haq

M. D. Lakhe, Mr. Lonare

Devidas s/o Dashrath Wirutkar

Shetkari Shikshan Sanstha, Nandori, through Head Master; Mahatma Phule Vidyalaya, Nandori; Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to termination of a peon from a private school without holding an enquiry under the MEPS Rules.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of termination order and reinstatement with all benefits.

Filing Reason

Termination order dated 24.04.1997 passed by the management on grounds of misconduct without any enquiry and without giving opportunity to the petitioner.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had admitted the petition and granted ad interim stay of the termination order, which continued during pendency.

Issues

Whether termination order passed without enquiry under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 is valid? Whether writ petition should be entertained despite availability of alternative remedy given the circumstances?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Termination order inflicted major penalty without any enquiry as required under the MEPS Rules; no opportunity given; hence termination void. Respondent-Management: Petitioner admitted guilt, as per letters; thus termination justified. Petitioner: Denied admission of guilt and contents of termination order.

Ratio Decidendi

A termination order passed on grounds of misconduct without holding an enquiry as mandated under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 and without affording an opportunity to the employee is invalid. Merely alleging admission of guilt does not substitute for procedural enquiry. In writ jurisdiction, where a petition has been pending long and interim relief was granted and not challenged, alternative remedy is not a bar to granting relief.

Judgment Excerpts

The order of termination mentions about the misconduct. In the reply, the respondent/management averred that the petitioner admitted the guilt. Petitioner is not accepting the contents of the termination order. By the notice the management inflicted major penalty without giving any opportunity. This Court while issuing notice on 28.4.1997 granted an ad interim relief in terms of prayer clause (iv). That resulted into stay of the impugned order of termination. The petitioner, therefore, has been in service till this date. There is nothing on record to show that the management at any point of time challenged the interim order. So far as alternative remedy is concerned, we are not inclined to accept it. The petition is admitted and pending since 1997.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition challenging termination order dated 24.04.1997. High Court on 28.04.1997 issued notice and granted ad interim stay of termination. Respondents filed reply but did not challenge interim order. Matter remained pending with repeated adjournments. Finally heard and decided on 01.07.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Peon in Private School for Lack of Enquiry under MEPS Rules. Termination Order Passed Without Granting Opportunity to Employee and Without Conducting Enquiry as Required Under Maharashtra Employees of Private ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Injunction in Land Dispute Over 33-Foot Shiv (Boundary) — Plaintiff's Possession and Ownership Upheld Based on Title Documents and Commissioner's Report.