Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder of Wife and Daughter Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Sustained as Motive, Last Seen, Extra-Judicial Confession, and Dying Declaration Formed Complete Chain.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 36
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Abbasali Khajbhai Sayyad, was convicted by the Vth Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of his wife Najma Abbasali Sayyad and daughter Anjum Abbasali Sayyad on 29th September 2005. The prosecution case was that the appellant, after marriage in 2001, started suspecting his wife's character and quarreling with her. About 1.5 years before the incident, he left her at her father's house and went away, returning only 8 days prior to the incident. After a panchayat, he took her back but on the night of the incident, he killed both by striking them with a stone at his brother-in-law's house. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment. The High Court, on appeal, examined the circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen evidence, extra-judicial confession, and dying declaration. The court found that the dying declaration recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate was reliable and that the extra-judicial confession made to PW9 was corroborated. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Motive - Suspicion of Character - The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife and daughter by inflicting stone blows. The court held that the chain of circumstances including motive, last seen together, extra-judicial confession, and dying declaration was complete and pointed to the guilt of the appellant. (Paras 1-24)

B) Evidence Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability - The dying declaration of the deceased wife recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate was found to be voluntary and truthful, and was relied upon by the court. (Paras 15-18)

C) Evidence Law - Extra-Judicial Confession - Credibility - The extra-judicial confession made by the appellant to PW9 (brother-in-law) was corroborated by other evidence and was held to be admissible. (Paras 19-21)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant for murder of his wife and daughter under Section 302 IPC based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • motive
  • last seen together
  • extra-judicial confession
  • dying declaration
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (04) 83

Criminal Appeal No.51 of 2008

2013-04-02

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, Shri. P.D. Kode

Mr. Sachin B. Chandan (for Appellant), Mr. P.S. Hingorani (APP for State)

Abbasali Khajbhai Sayyad

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murdering his wife and daughter

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the conviction based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable. Whether the dying declaration and extra-judicial confession are reliable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and the dying declaration was not reliable. State argued that the chain of circumstances was complete and the dying declaration was voluntary.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen together, extra-judicial confession, and dying declaration formed a complete chain pointing to the guilt of the appellant, and the dying declaration was voluntary and truthful.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is directed against the judgement and order dated 12th July, 2006 passed by the learned Vth Ad-hoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Solapur, convicting the appellant for committing the murder of his wife Najma Abbasali Sayyad and daughter Anjum Abbasali Sayyad... The dying declaration recorded by the Special Executive Magistrate was found to be voluntary and truthful.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Vth Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur on 12th July 2006 for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which dismissed the appeal on 2nd April 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Caste Scrutiny Committee to Decide Caste Validity Certificate Application Within Three Months. Petitioner's Admission Protected During Interregnum Without Creating Equity.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder of Wife and Daughter Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Sustained as Motive, Last Seen, Extra-Judicial Confession, and Dying Declaration Formed Complete Chain.