Bombay High Court Grants Decree in Favour of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Action — Defendant's Mark 'EASY WASH' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'EZEE' for Liquid Detergent.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 63
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Plaintiff, Godrej Consumer Products Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Alchemy Biotech Private Limited. The Plaintiff is the proprietor of the registered trademark 'EZEE' under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, with registration numbers 410491 and 513930 in Class 03 for detergents in liquid form for laundry use and soaps, detergents, toilet preparations, and scouring powder. The Defendant adopted the mark 'EASY WASH' for liquid detergent, which the Plaintiff contended was almost identical and deceptively similar to its mark 'EZEE'. The Plaintiff led evidence through its Constituted Attorney, Mr. Mandar Chandrachud, who filed an affidavit confirming the plaint contents and exhibited documents including the Power of Attorney, certified copies of trademark registrations, and sales/advertisement figures from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010. The Defendant did not appear despite service. The Court, after considering the evidence, found that the marks 'EZEE' and 'EASY WASH' are deceptively similar in sound, spelling, and overall impression, and that the goods are identical. The Court held that the Plaintiff had proved infringement of its registered trademark and passing off. Consequently, the Court decreed the suit in favour of the Plaintiff, granting a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from using the mark 'EASY WASH' or any deceptively similar mark, and ordered the Defendant to pay costs of the suit.

Headnote

A) Trade Marks - Infringement - Deceptive Similarity - Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, Sections 28, 29 - Plaintiff's registered mark 'EZEE' for liquid detergent in Class 03 - Defendant using 'EASY WASH' for identical goods - Court found the marks deceptively similar in sound, spelling, and overall impression, leading to likelihood of confusion - Held that infringement and passing off were established (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Defendant's use of the mark 'EASY WASH' for liquid detergent infringes the Plaintiff's registered trademark 'EZEE' and constitutes passing off.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Suit decreed in favour of the Plaintiff. Permanent injunction granted restraining the Defendant from using the mark 'EASY WASH' or any deceptively similar mark in relation to liquid detergent or any other goods. Defendant ordered to pay costs of the suit.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • Passing off
  • Deceptive similarity
  • Registered trademark
  • Class 03
  • Liquid detergent
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (02) 23

SUIT No. 263 OF 2007

2013-02-25

S. J. KATHAWALLA

Mr. Himanshu Kane a/w Mr. Ashutosh Kane, Mr. Hiren Kamod and Ms. Aditi Kulkarni for the Plaintiff.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for trademark infringement and passing off.

Remedy Sought

Permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from using the mark 'EASY WASH' or any deceptively similar mark, and costs.

Filing Reason

Defendant's use of the mark 'EASY WASH' for liquid detergent allegedly infringing Plaintiff's registered trademark 'EZEE' and passing off.

Issues

Whether the Defendant's mark 'EASY WASH' is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered mark 'EZEE'. Whether the Defendant's use constitutes infringement and passing off.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that 'EASY WASH' is almost identical and deceptively similar to 'EZEE' in sound, spelling, and overall impression, and used for identical goods. Defendant did not appear or contest the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The marks 'EZEE' and 'EASY WASH' are deceptively similar in sound, spelling, and overall impression, and the goods are identical, leading to likelihood of confusion. Therefore, the Plaintiff's registered trademark is infringed and passing off is established.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an action for infringement of trade mark and passing off committed by the Defendant by using almost identical and/or similar trade mark EASY WASH upon and in relation to liquid detergent. The Plaintiff is a company established under the Companies Act, 1956 and is the present (subsequent) proprietor of the trade mark EZEE registered under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 under Nos. 410491 and 513930 both in class 03 in respect of detergents in liquid form for laundry use and soaps, detergents, toilet preparations and scouring powder.

Procedural History

Suit filed in 2007. Plaintiff led evidence through affidavit. Defendant did not appear. Judgment delivered on 25 February 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958: 28, 29
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Commercial Dispute — Allegations of Cheating and Forgery Not Purely Civil in Nature. The Court held that the High Court correctly declined to quash proceedings under Se...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Judicial Review of State Actions in Contractual Disputes: Evolution and Current Scope. From Traditional Boundaries to Modern Oversight: Ensuring Fairness and Transparency in State Contractual Matters