High Court of Bombay Allows Application to Relax Bail Conditions After Death of Accused in Bank Fraud Case. Conditions Imposed to Secure Bail of Chairman of Cooperative Bank Held Inoperative Upon Death, and Legal Representatives Not Liable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application by the legal representatives of deceased Narayan Motilal Kabre seeking relaxation of conditions imposed by the High Court in an earlier bail order. Narayan Kabre, while Chairman of Dadasaheb N.M. Kabre Nagari Sahakari Bank Limited, was implicated in Crime No. 90/2010 along with directors and others for offences under sections 406, 408, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. His bail application was rejected by the Sessions Court, leading him to file Criminal Application No. 491 of 2011 before the High Court. On 7 February 2011, the Court noted the severity of his role in disbursing a loan of Rs. 24,66,000 to two ineligible defaulters and routing family fixed deposits. On 8 February 2011, his sons, Vinay Kabre and Dr. Mahendra Kabre (present applicants), submitted a proposal undertaking not to withdraw fixed deposits worth Rs. 31,74,673 and not to alienate a house property worth Rs. 25 lakhs until the loan was recovered, and Narayan would endeavor to deposit Rs. 15 lakhs. Accepting the proposal, the Court released Narayan on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with conditions, including the lien on the property and non-alienation till disposal of the criminal case. Narayan died on 21 March 2012. The applicants, being his wife and sons, contended that with the death of the accused, the criminal case abated and the bail order became infructuous; the conditions were solely for securing his presence and could not bind his legal representatives. They also argued that the fixed deposits belonged to family members, and they faced hardship. The State opposed, urging that the undertaking was given voluntarily by the sons and accepted by the Court, and the conditions should remain in force given the fraudulent activities. The Court examined the meaning and purpose of bail, referencing definitions from dictionaries and a precedent, and considered the legal position that upon the death of an accused, the need for a bail order ceases. It ultimately held that the conditions automatically lapsed and the legal representatives were not bound, allowing the application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Meaning and Purpose - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Bail is defined as the temporary release of an arrested person on security that the person will obey the court's orders and appear for trial. The death of an accused results in abatement of the criminal case, and the purpose of bail ceases. The question is whether conditions imposed as part of the bail order continue to operate against the legal representatives of the deceased accused. (Paras 8-9)

B) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Conditions Ceasing on Death - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Upon the death of an accused, the bail order and its conditions become infructuous because the primary purpose of securing the accused's presence is no longer applicable. Legal representatives are not liable under criminal law for the actions of the deceased, and conditions cannot bind them indefinitely. (Paras 7-9)

C) Criminal Law - Liability of Legal Representatives - General Principles - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - No criminal liability can be passed upon legal heirs or legal representatives under any circumstances. The criminal machinery cannot be used with a vindictive approach to penalize family members for the alleged acts of the accused. (Para 7)

D) Banking Law - Cooperative Bank Fraud - Conditions on Deposits and Property - Not specified - The dispute involved alleged misappropriation of bank funds and fraudulent loan disbursal. The court had imposed conditions requiring undertakings not to withdraw fixed deposits and not to alienate property, accepted as a proposal from the sons of the deceased to secure bail. The question arose whether these restrictions could persist after the death of the accused. (Paras 4-5, 7-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conditions imposed in a bail order survive after the death of the accused, and whether the legal representatives are bound by such conditions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed; conditions relaxed and declared not in force, legal representatives not bound.

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (01) 2

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4223 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 491 OF 2011

2013-01-21

M.T. Joshi

Mr. Kishor C. Sant (for the applicants), Mr. P.P. More (A.P.P. for the RespondentState)

Smt. Vimal Narayan Kabre, Vinay s/o Narayan Kabre, Dr. Mahendra s/o Narayan Kabre

The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Erandol Police Station, District Jalgaon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application by legal representatives of deceased accused seeking relaxation of conditions imposed in a bail order

Remedy Sought

The applicants sought relaxation of the conditions imposed, a declaration that the bail order is no longer in force, and that they are not bound by the conditions

Filing Reason

Death of the main accused Narayan Kabre on 21 March 2012 led to abatement of the prosecution and rendered the bail conditions infructuous

Previous Decisions

Criminal Application No. 491 of 2011 was allowed by the High Court on 8 February 2011 imposing conditions; the trial court had earlier rejected the bail application of deceased Narayan Kabre

Issues

Whether the conditions imposed in the bail order of deceased Narayan Kabre survive after his death and bind his legal representatives

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that due to the death of Narayan Kabre, the prosecution abated and the bail order ceased to be in force; the conditions were only for securing his presence and cannot bind legal heirs; no criminal liability can be passed to legal representatives; the fixed deposits are in the names of family members, not the deceased alone; they face hardship; the undertaking was given under duress while Narayan was in ICU to secure his release. Respondent argued that the proposal cum undertaking was signed by the sons on their own behalf and accepted by the Court; the Court was initially not inclined to grant bail; the conditions were essential; the investigation revealed serious fraud and misappropriation; the undertaking should continue to be binding.

Ratio Decidendi

Upon the death of an accused, the criminal case abates and the bail order becomes infructuous; conditions imposed as part of the bail order, including undertakings given by relatives, automatically cease to operate; legal representatives cannot be held bound by such conditions as the purpose of bail is solely to secure the presence of the accused.

Judgment Excerpts

The meaning of word 'bail' in Blacks Law Dictionary (VIth Edition) is thus: 'to procure release of one charge with an offence by ensuring his future attendance in Court and compelling him to remain within the jurisdiction of the Court.' Upon death of Narayan Kabre, the prosecution against him is abated. In the circumstances, the conditions imposed upon him vide the order dated 8th February, 2011 cannot be kept in force. The conditions were imposed by this Court in view of the proposal only for the purpose of granting bail to the deceased. The order now ceases to be in force. The investigation papers also reveal that fraudulently, all the fixed deposits in the name of family members of the accused/applicant, were routed and diverted.

Procedural History

Deceased Narayan Kabre was accused in Crime No. 90/2010 with offences under IPC. His bail application was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon. He filed Criminal Application No. 491 of 2011 before the High Court. On 8 February 2011, the High Court accepted a proposal/undertaking from his sons and released him on bail with conditions. Narayan died on 21 March 2012. The present application was filed by his legal representatives seeking relaxation of those conditions.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 406, 408, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Directing Consideration of Representation for Release of Land from Tamil Nadu Bhoodhaan Yagna Act. Court holds that where a representation is pending and a favorable report exists, the authority must decide...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Allows Application to Relax Bail Conditions After Death of Accused in Bank Fraud Case. Conditions Imposed to Secure Bail of Chairman of Cooperative Bank Held Inoperative Upon Death, and Legal Representatives Not Liable.