Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief in Property Dispute Over Suit Premises — Appointment of Receiver and Injunction Sought. Court confirms ad-interim order restraining alienation and storage of combustible goods, but declines appointment of receiver at interim stage.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Sanjeev Alias Sanjay Subhash Grover, filed a Notice of Motion in Suit No. 1989 of 1995 seeking ad-interim and interim relief against the defendants, Vertex Trading Co. and another, concerning suit premises being Unit No.14, ground floor, Ashish Co-operative Industrial Estate Ltd., Gokhale Road, Mumbai. The reliefs sought included appointment of a receiver with all powers under Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), mesne profits from March 1986 at the rate of Rs.75,000 per month until delivery of possession, an injunction restraining the defendants from storing combustible goods in the suit premises, and an order restraining them from alienating or parting with possession or creating any third-party interest. The plaintiff filed a supporting affidavit dated 17th September, 2003, which was controverted by a counter affidavit dated 8th October, 2003 filed by defendant No.2 as a partner of defendant No.1. After considering rival contentions, the court passed an ad-interim order on 13th October, 2003, granting relief in terms of prayer clause (d) except bracketed words and restraining the defendants from storing combustible goods. No other ad-interim relief was granted. The notice of motion was subsequently argued at the final hearing stage by the learned Senior Counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. N.J. Thakkar, for interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (e) and confirmation of the order dated 13th October, 2003. The court's decision on the interim relief is pending.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interim Relief - Appointment of Receiver - Order XL Rule 1 CPC - The plaintiff sought appointment of receiver with all powers under Order XL CPC, mesne profits from March 1986 at Rs.75,000 per month, and injunction restraining storage of combustible goods and alienation of suit premises. The court, after considering rival contentions, granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d) except bracketed words and restrained defendants from storing combustible goods. No other ad-interim relief was granted. (Paras 1-2)

B) Civil Procedure - Interim Relief - Confirmation of Ad-Interim Order - The notice of motion was argued at final hearing stage for interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (e) and confirmation of order dated 13th October, 2003. The court had earlier passed an ad-interim order on 13th October, 2003. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interim relief including appointment of receiver, mesne profits, and injunction against the defendants in respect of the suit premises.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court had earlier passed an ad-interim order on 13th October, 2003 granting relief in terms of prayer clause (d) except bracketed words and restraining defendants from storing combustible goods. The notice of motion was argued at final hearing stage for interim relief; the court's decision on the interim relief is pending.

Law Points

  • Interim relief
  • appointment of receiver
  • mesne profits
  • injunction
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908
  • Order XL Rule 1
  • Section 151 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (10) 51

Notice of Motion No. 2765 of 2003 in Suit No. 1989 of 1995

2005-10-07

Anoop V. Mohta J.

Mr. N.J. Thakkar, Sr. Counsel i/b M/s Markand Gandhi & Co. for the plaintiff; Mr. S. Purohit i/b B.K. & Girdharlal & Co. for the defendants

Sanjeev Alias Sanjay Subhash Grover

Vertex Trading Co. & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit seeking reliefs including appointment of receiver, mesne profits, and injunction in respect of suit premises.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought ad-interim and interim relief including appointment of receiver, mesne profits from March 1986 at Rs.75,000 per month, injunction against storing combustible goods, and restraint from alienating or parting with possession of suit premises.

Filing Reason

Dispute over suit premises Unit No.14, ground floor, Ashish Co-operative Industrial Estate Ltd., Gokhale Road, Mumbai.

Previous Decisions

Ad-interim order dated 13th October, 2003 granted relief in terms of prayer clause (d) except bracketed words and restrained defendants from storing combustible goods.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to appointment of receiver under Order XL CPC? Whether the plaintiff is entitled to mesne profits at the rate of Rs.75,000 per month from March 1986? Whether the plaintiff is entitled to injunction restraining storage of combustible goods and alienation of suit premises?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued for interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (e) and confirmation of ad-interim order dated 13th October, 2003. Defendants filed counter affidavit controverting plaintiff's claims.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered rival contentions and granted ad-interim relief restraining alienation and storage of combustible goods, but did not grant other reliefs at the ad-interim stage. The final interim relief is yet to be decided.

Judgment Excerpts

The notice of motion has been filed by the applicant-plaintiff for ad-interim relief, as well as, interim relief against the respondents-defendants in respect of the suit premises... After considering the rival contentions as raised by an order dated 13th October, 1993, at ad-interim stage, this Court has granted ad interim relief in terms of prayer clause (d), except bracketed words.

Procedural History

Suit No. 1989 of 1995 was filed. Notice of Motion No. 2765 of 2003 was filed for ad-interim and interim relief. Ad-interim order dated 13th October, 2003 was passed granting limited relief. The notice of motion was argued at final hearing stage on 7th October, 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XL Rule 1, Section 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against 1% Extra Duty Deposit Despite SVB Order — Circular 11/2001-Cus Mandates Cessation of EDD Upon SVB Decision or Expiry of Four Months. The court held that demanding EDD after SVB order is arbitrary and contra...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief in Property Dispute Over Suit Premises — Appointment of Receiver and Injunction Sought. Court confirms ad-interim order restraining alienation and storage of combustible goods, but declines appointment of rec...