High Court of Bombay at Goa Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition for Industrial Estate Expansion — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 35 per sq. metre for Front Depth and Rs. 25 per sq. metre for Rear Depth with Deduction for Development Costs. Belting Method Applied to Determine Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 153
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to an appeal by the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Goa, Daman and Diu, IDC, against the judgment of the Reference Court enhancing compensation for land acquired for expansion of Sancoale Industrial Estate. The Government of Goa issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 27-5-1987, published on 27-8-1987, proposing acquisition of 91,176 sq. metres from survey no.185, Village Sancoale. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs. 8 per sq. metre for plain and bharad land, Rs. 6 per sq. metre for paddy field, and Rs. 5 per sq. metre for remaining land. The claimants, owners of 85,856 sq. metres, sought reference under Section 18. The Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs. 30 per sq. metre uniformly. The appellant challenged this enhancement, while the claimants filed cross-objections seeking further enhancement. The High Court considered the evidence, including sale deeds of comparable lands, and held that the market value should be determined based on the potential for industrial development. It applied the belting method, fixing Rs. 35 per sq. metre for the first 50 metres depth and Rs. 25 per sq. metre for the remaining depth, after deducting 20% for development costs. The court also granted solatium under Section 23(2), additional compensation under Section 23(1A), and interest under Section 28. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objections were partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Market Value Determination - Comparable Sales Method - The court determined market value based on sale deeds of comparable lands, applying deductions for development costs and using the belting method for depth-wise valuation. Held that the Reference Court's enhancement to Rs. 30 per sq. metre was justified, but further enhanced to Rs. 35 per sq. metre for the first 50 metres and Rs. 25 per sq. metre for the remaining depth, with additional benefits under Sections 23(1A), 23(2), and 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Paras 1-10).

B) Land Acquisition - Potential for Development - Industrial Estate Expansion - The land was acquired for expansion of Sancoale Industrial Estate, indicating potential for industrial development. The court considered the land's potential and comparable sales of industrial plots to determine market value. Held that the land had development potential, justifying higher compensation (Paras 3-6).

C) Land Acquisition - Deduction for Development Costs - Belting Method - The court applied a deduction of 20% for development costs and used the belting method to account for varying value based on depth from the road. Held that such deductions and method are appropriate for large tracts of land with development potential (Paras 7-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

What is the correct market value of the acquired land for the purpose of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and whether the claimants are entitled to enhanced compensation?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal and partly allowed the cross-objections. It fixed market value at Rs. 35 per sq. metre for the first 50 metres depth and Rs. 25 per sq. metre for the remaining depth, with deduction of 20% for development costs. Claimants entitled to solatium under Section 23(2), additional compensation under Section 23(1A), and interest under Section 28.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Section 4(1)
  • Section 23
  • Section 24
  • market value determination
  • comparable sales method
  • potential for development
  • deduction for development costs
  • belting method
  • solatium
  • additional compensation
  • interest
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (10) 38

First Appeal No. 78 of 2002 with Cross Objection No. 18 of 2005

2005-10-24

R. M. Lodha, N. A. Britto

M. S. Sonak, P. S. Rao for Appellant; V. B. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with J. Cardozo for Respondent Nos.1(b) to 1(i) and 2

Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Goa, Daman and Diu, I.D.C. (Shri Saraswati Mandir, building), Panaji

1. Shaik Mohidin Shaik Dawood (since deceased) represented by L.Rs., 2. Mrs. Hazirabi Shaik Mohidin, 3. Deputy Collector (L.A.) & Land Acquisition Officer, Panaji

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against enhancement of compensation in land acquisition matter

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought reduction of compensation; claimants sought further enhancement via cross-objections

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with compensation awarded by Land Acquisition Officer and Reference Court

Previous Decisions

Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs. 8, Rs. 6, Rs. 5 per sq. metre; Reference Court enhanced to Rs. 30 per sq. metre

Issues

Whether the Reference Court correctly determined the market value of the acquired land? Whether the claimants are entitled to further enhancement of compensation?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Reference Court erred in relying on sale deeds of small plots and not considering the large size of acquired land. Claimants argued that the compensation should be higher based on comparable sales and potential for industrial development.

Ratio Decidendi

In determining market value for large tracts of land with development potential, the court may apply the belting method and deduct development costs. Comparable sales of small plots can be used with appropriate adjustments.

Judgment Excerpts

For the purpose of expansion of Sancoale Industrial Estate, the Government of Goa issued a Notification dated 27 5 1987 which was published in the Official Gazette on 27 8 1987 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act proposing acquisition of 91,176 sq. metres of land from survey no.185, Village Sancoale. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.8/ per sq. metre in respect of plain and bharad land, Rs.6/ per sq. metre for paddy field and Rs.5/ per sq. metre for the remaining land. The Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs.30 per sq. metre uniformly.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4(1) on 27-5-1987, published 27-8-1987. Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation. Claimants sought reference under Section 18. Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs.30 per sq. metre. Appellant filed First Appeal No. 78 of 2002; claimants filed Cross Objection No. 18 of 2005. High Court disposed of both on 24-10-2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1), Section 18, Section 23, Section 23(1A), Section 23(2), Section 28
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Petitions for Mandamus in TAIT-2022 Teacher Recruitment; Petitioners Seek Permission to Edit Self-Certification on Pavitra Portal. Court Examines Right of Candidates to Participate in Second Round Under Right of Children to Fr...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Mutation Dispute — Failure to Consider Evidence and Apply Correct Legal Principles. Court sets aside order for non-consideration of documentary evidence and misapplic...