Bombay High Court Quashes Liquidation Order Against Co-operative Society for Violation of Natural Justice. Interim Order Under Section 102(1)(c)(iv) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Set Aside for Lack of Hearing and Non-Compliance with Statutory Conditions.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 28
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, members of the Highway Consumers Co-operative Society Ltd., challenged an interim order of liquidation passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies on 12th September 1986 under Section 102(1)(c)(iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society had a yearly turnover of Rs.1.84 crores, 4144 members, authorised share capital of Rs.3,50,000, subscribed capital of Rs.2,97,000, 16 departments, and 457 employees. The Deputy Registrar issued the order without affording any hearing to the society and without recording a finding that the society's continuance was detrimental to the interests of its members or the public. The court noted that the order was passed in a routine manner without application of mind. The petitioners argued that the order violated principles of natural justice and the statutory conditions precedent for liquidation. The respondents contended that the order was interim and did not require a hearing. The court held that even an interim order of liquidation cannot be passed without hearing the society, as it has serious consequences. The court also found that the Deputy Registrar did not record any satisfaction that the society's continuance was detrimental, which is a mandatory condition under Section 102(1)(c)(iv). The court quashed the interim order and directed the Deputy Registrar to hear the society before passing any fresh order. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Liquidation - Section 102(1)(c)(iv) Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Interim Order - The Deputy Registrar passed an interim order of liquidation without hearing the society and without recording satisfaction that the society's continuance is detrimental to the interests of its members or the public - Held that such an order violates principles of natural justice and statutory conditions, and is liable to be quashed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an interim order of liquidation under Section 102(1)(c)(iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 can be passed without affording a hearing to the society and without satisfying the conditions precedent for liquidation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the interim order of liquidation dated 12th September 1986 and directed the Deputy Registrar to hear the society before passing any fresh order. The petition was allowed.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Section 102(1)(c)(iv) Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Interim liquidation order
  • Conditions precedent for liquidation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (05) 248

Writ Petition No.2668 of 1987

2005-06-21

S.A. Bobde, J.

Dr. B.R. Naik with Mr. Prashant Naik for the Petitioners; Mr. Solkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3

Kashinath J. Dube and others

K.K. Sudarshan, Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an interim order of liquidation passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section 102(1)(c)(iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the interim order of liquidation dated 12th September 1986.

Filing Reason

The interim order was passed without hearing the society and without satisfying the conditions precedent for liquidation.

Issues

Whether an interim order of liquidation under Section 102(1)(c)(iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 can be passed without affording a hearing to the society. Whether the Deputy Registrar recorded satisfaction that the society's continuance is detrimental to the interests of its members or the public as required under Section 102(1)(c)(iv).

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the interim order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without application of mind. Respondents contended that the order was interim and did not require a hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

An interim order of liquidation under Section 102(1)(c)(iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be passed without affording a hearing to the society, as it has serious consequences. The Deputy Registrar must record satisfaction that the society's continuance is detrimental to the interests of its members or the public before passing such an order.

Judgment Excerpts

The Deputy Registrar has not recorded any satisfaction that the continuance of the society is detrimental to the interests of its members or the public. The order has been passed in a routine manner without application of mind.

Procedural History

On 12th September 1986, the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies issued an interim order of liquidation under Section 102(1)(c)(iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.2668 of 1987 challenging the order. The petition was heard and decided on 21st June 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 102(1)(c)(iv)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Findings Are Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in SC/ST Act and IPC Case, Upholding Protection for Public Servant Under Section 197 CrPC. The Court held that a clerk involved in land allotment paperwork was entitled to protection under Section 197 of the Code of Cr...