Bombay High Court Allows Family Pension to Unmarried Daughter in Suo Motu Writ Petition — Respondents Did Not Question Entitlement. The court directed processing of family pension claim with arrears and interest at 6% per annum from the date of father's death under the New Family Pension Scheme.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 56
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerns a suo motu writ petition registered based on a letter from Dina Mavji Maru, an unmarried daughter, claiming family pension under the New Family Pension Scheme. Her mother, Hiroo Mavji Maru, served as a female sweeper in INHS Ashvini and died on 11 February 1971 while in service. Family pension was granted to her husband, Mavji Khoda Maru, with effect from 12 February 1971. Mavji Khoda Maru died on 6 November 1985. The petitioner then claimed family pension. In the reply affidavit filed by Mohd. Mumtaz Ahmad, Assistant Controller of Defence Accountants, the petitioner's entitlement to the family pension scheme was not questioned. The only stated issue was that the family pension scheme is sanctioned upon receipt of the pension claim through the Head of the Office where the deceased served. The court noted that the respondents did not dispute the petitioner's entitlement. The court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's claim for family pension and pay arrears with interest at 6% per annum from the date of her father's death, i.e., 6 November 1985, until the date of payment. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Family Pension - Entitlement of Unmarried Daughter - New Family Pension Scheme - The petitioner, an unmarried daughter, claimed family pension after the death of her father, who was receiving pension as a widower of a deceased government servant. The respondents did not question her entitlement. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to family pension and directed the respondents to process the claim and pay arrears with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the father's death until payment. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, as an unmarried daughter, is entitled to family pension under the New Family Pension Scheme after the death of her father, who was receiving the pension as a widower.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's claim for family pension and pay arrears with interest at 6% per annum from 6 November 1985 until payment. The writ petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Family pension entitlement
  • Unmarried daughter
  • New Family Pension Scheme
  • Suo motu writ petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (05) 192

Suo Motu Writ Petition No.1113 of 1988

2005-06-09

R. M. Lodha, J.P. Devadhar

None for the petitioner, Mr. Y.R. Mishra for the respondents

Miss Dina Mavji Maru

1. The Union of India, 2. The Controller of Defence Accounts. (Pensions) Allahabad.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suo motu writ petition based on a letter from the petitioner claiming family pension under the New Family Pension Scheme.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought family pension as an unmarried daughter after the death of her father.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's mother died in service, and after her father's death, she claimed family pension.

Previous Decisions

Family pension was granted to the petitioner's father from 12 February 1971 until his death on 6 November 1985.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to family pension under the New Family Pension Scheme as an unmarried daughter.

Submissions/Arguments

The respondents did not question the petitioner's entitlement to family pension; they only stated that the scheme is sanctioned upon receipt of claim through the Head of Office.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner, as an unmarried daughter, is entitled to family pension under the New Family Pension Scheme, and the respondents having not disputed her entitlement, are directed to process the claim and pay arrears with interest.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner's entitlement to the family pension scheme is not questioned. We direct the respondents to process the petitioner's claim for family pension and pay arrears with interest at 6% per annum from 6th November 1985 till the date of payment.

Procedural History

The writ petition was registered suo motu based on a letter from the petitioner to a Judge of the Court. The respondents filed a reply affidavit. The court heard the matter and disposed of the petition on 9 June 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Family Pension to Unmarried Daughter in Suo Motu Writ Petition — Respondents Did Not Question Entitlement. The court directed processing of family pension claim with arrears and interest at 6% per annum from the date of fat...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Directors' Challenge to Pre-deposit Order in Cenvat Credit Penalty Case — Rule 13(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 Does Not Permit Personal Penalty on Directors. The court set aside the CESTAT order directing pre-deposit of ...