Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 307 IPC for Knife Attack — Refusal of Immoral Proposal as Motive. Attempt to Murder Conviction Sustained Based on Consistent Oral Testimony and Medical Evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Roshanlal Jagannath Soni, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 59 of 1998, and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500, with default simple imprisonment for six months. The appellant challenged this conviction and sentence before the Bombay High Court. The prosecution case was that on 8 March 1997, the complainant, Munna alias Santoshkumar Ashokkumar Soni (PW1), went to the appellant's house to deliver a chit from the appellant's brother, Dinanath. The appellant asked the complainant to sleep with his wife because his wife had not conceived after 7-8 years of marriage. The complainant refused. Thereafter, the appellant took the complainant on the pretext of going to a friend's house, and was joined by accused no. 2, Baccha Soni. They took the complainant to an open site near Malhotra Company, where accused no. 2 gave fist blows, and the appellant assaulted the complainant with a knife, causing six injuries. The complainant managed to escape and ran to a petrol pump, where he fell down injured. Police took him to Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Bhiwandi, where his statement was recorded and an offence was registered. After investigation, a charge sheet was filed. The trial court convicted the appellant. The High Court, after hearing the appellant's counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor, examined the evidence. The court noted that the complainant (PW1) and his father (PW2) supported the prosecution case, and the medical evidence (PW3) corroborated the injuries. The court found no reason to disbelieve the witnesses and held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court also considered the appellant's argument that the incident occurred due to a sudden quarrel, but rejected it, noting the premeditated nature of the assault. The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - Conviction upheld - Appellant assaulted complainant with knife causing six injuries after complainant refused appellant's request to sleep with his wife - Medical evidence corroborated oral testimony - Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for attempting to murder the complainant by inflicting knife injuries is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence under Section 307 IPC.

Law Points

  • Section 307 IPC
  • attempt to murder
  • conviction upheld
  • knife attack
  • refusal of immoral proposal
  • motive
  • medical evidence
  • oral testimony
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (05) 100

Criminal Appeal No. 414 of 2001

2005-06-27

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani

Mr. Ramesh Dube Patil for Appellant, Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State

Roshanlal Jagannath Soni

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for attempting to murder the complainant by stabbing him with a knife after the complainant refused to sleep with the appellant's wife.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 59 of 1998 convicted the appellant under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him to seven years' RI and fine.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel argued that the incident occurred due to a sudden quarrel and there was no intention to commit murder. State argued that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through oral and medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The oral testimony of the complainant and his father was consistent and corroborated by medical evidence. The appellant's act of inflicting six knife injuries on the complainant after the complainant refused an immoral proposal demonstrated clear intention to commit murder, and the conviction under Section 307 IPC was justified.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant i.e. original accused no.1 has challenged the judgment and order dated 18.12.1999 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No. 59 of 1998. The prosecution case briefly stated is as under: The appellant-Roshanlal Jagannath Soni is the son of maternal uncle of complainant i.e. P.W.1 Munna alias Santoshkumar Ashokkumar Soni. On 8.3.1997 the complainant went to the house of the appellant to give him a chit sent by Dinanath the brother of the appellant. At that time, the appellant asked the complainant to sleep with his wife as his wife was not begetting a child even after 7 to 8 years of marriage. However, the complainant Munna refused to do so. Thereafter, the appellant assaulted the complainant Munna with knife causing him six injuries.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane on 18.12.1999 in Sessions Case No. 59 of 1998 under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to seven years' RI and fine. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 414 of 2001 before the Bombay High Court challenging the conviction and sentence. The High Court heard the appeal and dismissed it on 27.06.2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate. Pre-1950 documents showing 'Koshti' caste held to have probative value outweighing post-1950 entries.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 307 IPC for Knife Attack — Refusal of Immoral Proposal as Motive. Attempt to Murder Conviction Sustained Based on Consistent Oral Testimony and Medical Evidence.