Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Revised Pay Scales to MFAM Degree Holder from 1986. Qualification of MFAM treated as equivalent to Graduate degree for pay revision purposes under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Service Rules.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 109
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Jaymala Vilasrao Patil, was employed in the Office of Sangli Zilla Parishad, Sangli, holding a Diploma/Degree styled as M.F.A.M. (Member of Faculty of Ayurvedic Medicine). Her grievance was that while pay scales were revised for others styled as Graduates from 1st April, 1986, she was given the revised pay scale of 2000-3500 only from 4th March, 1993. She contended that her M.F.A.M. qualification was also a Graduate qualification and she ought to have been given the revised pay scales from 1st April, 1986. She relied on a letter dated 16th April, 1982 from the Maharashtra Council of Indian Medicines stating that the qualification was included in the II Schedule to the I.M.C.C. Act, 1970 and a qualification of four years or more may be treated as equivalent to a Degree. She also relied on a Division Bench decision in Writ Petition No.3369 of 1998, Dr. N.S. Kulkarni v. Z.P. Satara, decided on 25th October, 1999, where similar relief was granted to holders of M.F.A.S. qualification. The respondents opposed the petition. The court, after hearing the parties, allowed the petition, holding that the M.F.A.M. qualification is equivalent to a Graduate degree and directed that the petitioner be given the revised pay scales from 1st April, 1986 and subsequent revisions, with consequential benefits. Rule was made absolute accordingly.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pay Revision - Equivalence of Qualification - M.F.A.M. (Member of Faculty of Ayurvedic Medicine) - Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, Schedule II - The petitioner held M.F.A.M. qualification which was included in the II Schedule of the I.M.C.C. Act, 1970 and was a four-year course. The court held that the said qualification is equivalent to a Graduate degree and the petitioner is entitled to revised pay scales from 1st April, 1986, following the decision in Dr. N.S. Kulkarni v. Z.P. Satara (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the qualification of M.F.A.M. (Member of Faculty of Ayurvedic Medicine) is equivalent to a Graduate degree for the purpose of grant of revised pay scales from 1st April, 1986.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition allowed. Rule made absolute. Petitioner entitled to revised pay scales from 1st April, 1986 and subsequent revisions with consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Equivalence of qualifications
  • Pay revision
  • Graduate degree equivalence
  • MFAM qualification
  • II Schedule of IMCC Act 1970
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 244

Writ Petition No.6803 of 1999

2005-03-11

F.I. REBELLO, S.P. KUKDAY

Mr.N.V.Bandiwadkar for Petitioner, Mr.R.D.Rane for Respondent No.2

Dr.(Mrs.) Jaymala Vilasrao Patil

State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Public Health Department, The Chief Executive Officer Sangli Zilla Parishad, Sangli, Central Council of Indian Medicine

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking revised pay scales from 1st April, 1986 for holder of M.F.A.M. qualification.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to grant revised pay scales from 1st April, 1986 and subsequent revisions.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was given revised pay scale from 4th March, 1993 instead of 1st April, 1986, despite her qualification being equivalent to a Graduate degree.

Previous Decisions

Division Bench in Writ Petition No.3369 of 1998 (Dr. N.S. Kulkarni v. Z.P. Satara) allowed similar relief for M.F.A.S. holders.

Issues

Whether M.F.A.M. qualification is equivalent to a Graduate degree for pay revision purposes.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that M.F.A.M. is a four-year course included in II Schedule of IMCC Act, 1970 and should be treated as equivalent to Degree. Respondents opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The M.F.A.M. qualification, being a four-year course included in the II Schedule of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, is equivalent to a Graduate degree for the purpose of pay revision.

Judgment Excerpts

The said qualifications is included in the II Schedule to the I.M.C.C. Act, 1970 and a qualification having a duration of four years and above may be treated as equivalent to Degree.

Procedural History

Writ Petition filed in 1999. Heard and decided on 11th March, 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970: Schedule II
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Revised Pay Scales to MFAM Degree Holder from 1986. Qualification of MFAM treated as equivalent to Graduate degree for pay revision purposes under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Service Rules.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Case from Bengaluru to Gadag on Grounds of Wife's Convenience Under Section 24 CPC. The court overruled maintainability objection and held that the Dharwad Bench has jurisdiction to transfer case...