Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Agrees to Pay Rs.10,000 as Interest. Parties settle interest dispute amicably in appeal against Tribunal order that omitted interest on compensation.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shri Nandu Ramnath Alornekar, was the original claimant in Claim Petition No.16/96 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mapusa, Goa. He filed the present appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the Tribunal's order on the ground that it had not awarded interest on the compensation from the date of the application. The respondents included the alleged tortfeasors and the National Insurance Co. Ltd. During the hearing, Mr. Mulgaonkar, counsel for respondents No.3 and 5 (the insurance companies), stated that respondent No.3 was agreeable to pay Rs.10,000 by way of final settlement of the claim in the appeal towards interest payable to the appellant. Mr. Nachinolkar, counsel for the appellant, after taking instructions from the appellant who was present in court, stated that the appellant was ready and willing to accept the said amount of Rs.10,000 in full and final settlement of the claim in appeal. The court, noting the consent of both parties, disposed of the appeal in terms of the settlement. The court directed that the amount of Rs.10,000 be paid by respondent No.3 to the appellant within four weeks from the date of the order. The appeal was thus allowed in terms of the settlement, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Interest on Compensation - Consent Settlement - The appellant, original claimant, appealed against the Tribunal's order for not awarding interest on compensation from the date of application. The insurance company agreed to pay Rs.10,000 as final settlement of the claim in appeal. The appellant accepted the amount in full and final settlement. The appeal was disposed of in terms of the settlement. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on the compensation awarded from the date of application before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement. Respondent No.3 shall pay Rs.10,000 to the appellant within four weeks from today. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interest on compensation
  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Consent order
  • Settlement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 92

First Appeal No.164 of 2000

2005-03-10

A.P. Lavande, J.

Mr. Abhay Nachinolkar (for appellant), Mr. J.P. Mulgaonkar (for respondents No.3 and 5)

Shri Nandu Ramnath Alornekar

Kiran Vaigankar, Anand Ramesh Bhosle, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Pundalik Tato Haldankar, National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mapusa, in Claim Petition No.16/96, challenging non-award of interest on compensation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought interest on compensation from the date of application before the Tribunal.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal did not award interest on the compensation from the date of the application.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mapusa, passed an order in Claim Petition No.16/96 awarding compensation but without interest from the date of application.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on compensation from the date of application before the Tribunal.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Tribunal erred in not awarding interest from the date of application. Respondent No.3 (Insurance Company) agreed to pay Rs.10,000 as final settlement of the claim in appeal towards interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The court disposed of the appeal based on the consent of both parties, accepting the settlement amount of Rs.10,000 as full and final settlement of the claim in appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant who is the original claimant in Claim Petition No.16/96 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mapusa has filed this appeal on the ground that the Tribunal has not awarded interest on the compensation from the date of the application. Mr. Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for respondents No.3 and 5 has stated that respondent No.3 is agreeable to pay Rs.10,000/- by way of final settlement of the claim in the appeal towards interest payable to the appellant. Mr. Nachinolkar, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, upon taking instructions from the appellant who is present in the Court, states that the appellant is ready and willing to accept the said amount of Rs.10,000/- in full and final settlement of the claim in appeal.

Procedural History

The appellant filed Claim Petition No.16/96 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mapusa, which awarded compensation but without interest from the date of application. Aggrieved, the appellant filed First Appeal No.164 of 2000 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa. During the hearing, the insurance company agreed to pay Rs.10,000 as final settlement, which the appellant accepted. The court disposed of the appeal in terms of the settlement.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Agrees to Pay Rs.10,000 as Interest. Parties settle interest dispute amicably in appeal against Tribunal order that omitted interest on compensation.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Custody of Child for Travel Abroad — Family Dispute Must Be Agitated Before Competent Court. Writ of Mandamus Not Available for Child Custody Disputes Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.