High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjourns Criminal Revision Application for Joint Hearing with Related Matter. Court orders matter to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004 and adjourns to 24th February, 2005.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a brief order passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004. The court, presided over by Justice N. A. Britto, noted that this revision application was to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004. Consequently, the matter was adjourned to 24th February, 2005. The order was passed in the presence of advocates for the applicant, respondent No.1, and the Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2. No substantive legal issues were addressed in this procedural order.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Revision Application - Adjournment - Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004 was directed to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004 - Court adjourned the matter to 24th February, 2005 for joint hearing (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2004

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court adjourned Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004 to 24th February, 2005, to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004.

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 53

Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004

2005-02-17

N. A. Britto

Ms. Shreya Naik, Mr. M. S. Usgaonkar, Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Mr. S. N. Sardessai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Application

Judgment Excerpts

As this Criminal Revision Application is to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004 stand over to 24th February, 2005.

Procedural History

The matter was listed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa on 17th February, 2005, and was adjourned for joint hearing with another revision application.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Motor Accident Case, Enhances Compensation by Including Major Sons and Married Daughter as Dependents. The Court applied the Birender principle that legal representatives need not be fully dependent, and re...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Decrees Suit in Favour of Financial Advisor in Commercial Summary Suit for Professional Fees — Interpretation of Mandate Letter Options for Success Fee on Cash Sales of NPAs. Court holds that where the Bank exercised option of 100...