High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjourns Criminal Revision Application for Joint Hearing with Related Matter. Court orders matter to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004 and adjourns to 24th February, 2005.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a brief order passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004. The court, presided over by Justice N. A. Britto, noted that this revision application was to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004. Consequently, the matter was adjourned to 24th February, 2005. The order was passed in the presence of advocates for the applicant, respondent No.1, and the Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2. No substantive legal issues were addressed in this procedural order.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Revision Application - Adjournment - Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004 was directed to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004 - Court adjourned the matter to 24th February, 2005 for joint hearing (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2004

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court adjourned Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004 to 24th February, 2005, to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004.

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 53

Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004

2005-02-17

N. A. Britto

Ms. Shreya Naik, Mr. M. S. Usgaonkar, Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Mr. S. N. Sardessai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Application

Judgment Excerpts

As this Criminal Revision Application is to be heard along with Criminal Revision Application No. 24 of 2004 stand over to 24th February, 2005.

Procedural History

The matter was listed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa on 17th February, 2005, and was adjourned for joint hearing with another revision application.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Contempt Petition Against Directors for Wilful Disobedience of Deposit Order in Arbitration Dispute. Allegation of Failure to Deposit Rs.1,21,80,000 Despite Available Funds and Siphoning of Amounts Under Section 2(b) of Co...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Returned Candidate in Election Petition Alleging Corrupt Practices by a Chief Minister — Amelioration of Public Grievances Not Corrupt Practice Without Evidence of Abuse of Power. Order 41 Rule 22 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1...