Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Accused's Bail as Trial Nears Completion and No Grounds for Cancellation Exist. Bail Cancellation Order Set Aside as Accused Faced Trial Without Incident and Order Had Become Infructuous.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Thomas Fernandes, was granted bail in a criminal case. The District & Sessions Court, South Goa at Margao, cancelled his bail on 12 January 2004 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2003. The applicant challenged this cancellation before the Bombay High Court at Goa by filing Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2004. The High Court granted an interim stay of the cancellation order on 16 January 2004. During the pendency of the application, the trial in the Sessions Court proceeded and was nearly concluded by June 2005, with judgment expected in the first week of July 2005. The applicant's counsel submitted that the trial was almost over. The High Court observed that after perusing the Sessions Court's order, no case had been made out for cancellation of bail. Additionally, the applicant had faced the trial without absconding or tampering with witnesses, and the cancellation order had thus become practically infructuous. The High Court therefore quashed and set aside the order of the District & Sessions Court dated 12 January 2004 and allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Application. The applicant was not required to surrender to judicial custody.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Cancellation - Grounds - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The Sessions Court cancelled the applicant's bail. On perusal of the order, the High Court found that no case had been made out for cancellation of bail which was earlier granted. Held, the cancellation order was unjustified and is quashed. (Paras 3-4)

B) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Infructuous Order - Effect of Subsequent Events - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The trial in the Sessions Court was almost over, and the applicant had faced trial without absconding or tampering with witnesses. The High Court observed that the cancellation order had practically become infructuous and, having granted interim stay, the applicant need not surrender. Held, the application is allowed and the cancellation order set aside. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of the applicant's bail by the Sessions Court was justified

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court quashed and set aside the order of the District & Sessions Court, South Goa at Margao in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2003 dated 12.01.2004 cancelling the applicant's bail, and allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Application. The applicant was not required to surrender to judicial custody.

Law Points

  • Cancellation of bail requires strong grounds
  • not made out in this case
  • order of bail cancellation becomes infructuous when trial is nearly over and accused has faced trial without misconduct
  • interim stay of cancellation order need not be vacated when subsequent events render cancellation unjustified
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (06) 31

Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2004

2005-06-23

V. M. Kanade

Arun Bras De Sa, S. N. Sardessai

Thomas Fernandes

State of Goa, Police Inspector, Colva Police Station, Francis Coelho

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to order cancelling bail

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought to quash the order of the Sessions Court cancelling his bail.

Filing Reason

The applicant's bail was cancelled by the Sessions Court.

Previous Decisions

The District & Sessions Court, South Goa at Margao cancelled the applicant's bail on 12.01.2004 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2003.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of bail by the Sessions Court was justified.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant's counsel submitted that the trial in the Sessions Court was almost over and judgment was likely in the first week of July 2005.

Ratio Decidendi

Cancellation of bail was not justified as no case was made out for cancellation; moreover, the trial was almost over and the applicant had faced trial without absconding or tampering witnesses, rendering the cancellation order infructuous.

Judgment Excerpts

after having perused the Order passed by the District & Sessions Court, South Goa at Margao no case has been made out for cancellation of Bail which was already granted by the Court earlier before the Order of cancellation was passed. the Applicant in the mean time, has faced the trial and has not absconded nor has tampered with the witnesses. the Order ... has practically become infructuous since the Applicant in the mean time was granted interim stay of the Order of the Sessions Court.

Procedural History

The applicant was originally granted bail in a criminal case. On 12.01.2004, the District & Sessions Court, South Goa at Margao cancelled the bail in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2003. The applicant preferred Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2004 before the High Court challenging the cancellation. On 16.01.2004, the High Court granted an interim stay of the cancellation order. The trial proceeded and was nearly over by June 2005, with judgment expected in July 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Legitimacy of Child from Irregular Muslim Marriage in Partition Suit. Child born from marriage of Muslim man with Hindu woman held legitimate and entitled to inherit father's property under Muslim law.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Room for Want of Sanctioned Plan; Assessment Records and Repair Permissions Held Insufficient to Prove Legality of Construction.