Bombay High Court Adjourns Criminal Writ Petition for Two Weeks to Allow Respondents to Engage Counsel and State to File Affidavit. Respondents 7 and 8 present in court sought time to engage a lawyer; court granted adjournment and directed APP to file affidavit.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 101
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a brief order from the Bombay High Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1702 of 2005. The petitioner is Rohini Milind Shelar, and the respondents include the State of Maharashtra and others. On the date of hearing, respondents 7 and 8 were present in court and expressed their desire to engage a lawyer. At their request, the court adjourned the matter for two weeks. Additionally, the court directed the learned APP to file an affidavit. The order was passed by a division bench consisting of Smt. Ranjana Desai and D.B. Bhosale, JJ. No other issues were addressed in this interim order.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Adjournment - Engagement of Counsel - Respondents 7 and 8 present in court sought time to engage a lawyer - Court adjourned matter for two weeks at their instance - Held that parties should be given reasonable opportunity to engage counsel (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1702 OF 2005

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Matter adjourned for two weeks at the instance of respondents 7 and 8 to enable them to engage a lawyer. APP directed to file affidavit.

Law Points

  • Adjournment granted for engagement of counsel
  • direction to file affidavit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 110

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1702 of 2005

2005-07-13

Smt. Ranjana Desai, D.B. Bhosale

Mr. R.D. Suryawanshi for petitioner, Smt. A.S. Pai, APP

Rohini Milind Shelar

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition

Ratio Decidendi

Parties should be given reasonable opportunity to engage counsel.

Judgment Excerpts

Respondents 7 and 8 are present in the court. They state that they want to engage a lawyer. At their instance adjourned for two weeks. APP to file affidavit.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Section 7(15)(d) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 as Repugnant to Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court held that the rent control provision protecting a family member residing with the tenant doe...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Cases Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent and Procedural Lapses. Court held that mere registration of FIR under SC/ST Act does not bar anticipatory bail if no prima facie case of intentional insul...